The Social Truth of Schopenhauer's ‘Metaphysics of Pity’: Compassion and Critical Theory

Abstract Taking Horkheimer and Adorno's account of pity in the Dialectic of Enlightenment as my starting point, I show that Schopenhauer's compassion‐based moral theory exemplifies key elements of this account. In particular, this moral theory will be shown to possess a social truth for Horkheimer and Adorno because it is an expression of a wrong relation between the particular and the universal that reflects a social reality which is the cause of suffering to which compassion responds. I then argue, mainly with reference to Adorno's theory of moral impulse, that compassion is a presupposition of the type of critical social theory to which Horkheimer and Adorno are committed. This invites the question of how their position differs from Schopenhauer's.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.13085
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Truth of Schopenhauer's ‘Metaphysics of Pity’: Compassion and Critical Theory

David James
European Journal of Philosophy
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

The Social Truth of Schopenhauer's ‘Metaphysics of Pity’: Compassion and Critical Theory

David James
article en

Abstract

Abstract Taking Horkheimer and Adorno's account of pity in the Dialectic of Enlightenment as my starting point, I show that Schopenhauer's compassion‐based moral theory exemplifies key elements of this account. In particular, this moral theory will be shown to possess a social truth for Horkheimer and Adorno because it is an expression of a wrong relation between the particular and the universal that reflects a social reality which is the cause of suffering to which compassion responds. I then argue, mainly with reference to Adorno's theory of moral impulse, that compassion is a presupposition of the type of critical social theory to which Horkheimer and Adorno are committed. This invites the question of how their position differs from Schopenhauer's.

European Journal of PhilosophyVol. 34(1)
University of Warwick (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.