Balancing ethics and conservation: Assessing short‐term behavioral impacts of biopsy sampling in a recovering whale population

Abstract Long‐term monitoring programs based on individual identification have provided a sound basis for monitoring the status of endangered and recovering species. However, the impact of such research needs to be understood relative to the benefit gained. Here, we present a case study of a population that has been studied using genetic monitoring since 1995, the New Zealand southern right whale ( Eubalaena australis; tohorā). Tissue samples for genetic monitoring were collected using a remote biopsy system, an approach used widely in marine mammal research. Under most ethical frameworks, this is considered a minor impact of short duration, but perceived or potential impact limits sampling of some demographic classes (e.g., calves). We used data collected during surveys from 2020 to 2022 to measure short‐term behavioral impact of biopsy sample collection, with 748 responses collected over 52 days in the field from 524 individual whales. Biopsy sampling was overwhelmingly of minimal impact: the majority (90%) of biopsy responses were classified as either ‘no response’ (46%, n = 341) or ‘weak response’ (44%, n = 326). This study also supports previous work that calves do not show a greater reaction to biopsy sampling than adults. The behavior of the whales prior to being approached for biopsy sampling significantly affected the response elicited, but there was no measurable cumulative impact of multiple sampling, based on within‐year ( n = 113) or between‐year ( n = 21) comparisons. Genetic data from this monitoring project has been used to revise the conservation status of the population, to demonstrate the effectiveness of conservation polices and to understand circumpolar stock structure. Overall, this study confirms that biopsy sampling is a minimally invasive, data‐rich collection method that provides a wealth of information for conservation and management of whales. It typically causes only a minor, short‐term behavioral disturbance with wounds that, based on other studies, heal quickly and without discernible adverse health effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70077
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing ethics and conservation: Assessing short‐term behavioral impacts of biopsy sampling in a recovering whale population

Rochelle Constantine, Robert Harcourt, Esther Stuck, Ros Cole et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Marine animal studies overview
article

Balancing ethics and conservation: Assessing short‐term behavioral impacts of biopsy sampling in a recovering whale population

Rochelle Constantine, Robert Harcourt, Esther Stuck, Ros Cole, Debbie Steel, Aimee Van Der Reis, Emma L. Carroll, Leena Riekkola, Dorothea Heimeier, Catherine E. Meyer, Simon Childerhouse, Mike Ogle, Dave Lundquist
article en

Abstract

Abstract Long‐term monitoring programs based on individual identification have provided a sound basis for monitoring the status of endangered and recovering species. However, the impact of such research needs to be understood relative to the benefit gained. Here, we present a case study of a population that has been studied using genetic monitoring since 1995, the New Zealand southern right whale ( Eubalaena australis; tohorā). Tissue samples for genetic monitoring were collected using a remote biopsy system, an approach used widely in marine mammal research. Under most ethical frameworks, this is considered a minor impact of short duration, but perceived or potential impact limits sampling of some demographic classes (e.g., calves). We used data collected during surveys from 2020 to 2022 to measure short‐term behavioral impact of biopsy sample collection, with 748 responses collected over 52 days in the field from 524 individual whales. Biopsy sampling was overwhelmingly of minimal impact: the majority (90%) of biopsy responses were classified as either ‘no response’ (46%, n = 341) or ‘weak response’ (44%, n = 326). This study also supports previous work that calves do not show a greater reaction to biopsy sampling than adults. The behavior of the whales prior to being approached for biopsy sampling significantly affected the response elicited, but there was no measurable cumulative impact of multiple sampling, based on within‐year ( n = 113) or between‐year ( n = 21) comparisons. Genetic data from this monitoring project has been used to revise the conservation status of the population, to demonstrate the effectiveness of conservation polices and to understand circumpolar stock structure. Overall, this study confirms that biopsy sampling is a minimally invasive, data‐rich collection method that provides a wealth of information for conservation and management of whales. It typically causes only a minor, short‐term behavioral disturbance with wounds that, based on other studies, heal quickly and without discernible adverse health effects.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(7)
Ministry for the Environment (NZ), Oregon State University (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Department of Conservation (NZ), Cawthron Institute (NZ), Macquarie University (AU)
Department of Conservation, New Zealand, University of Auckland, Antarctica New Zealand, Australian Antarctic Division, British Antarctic Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.