Power, Interpersonal Trauma, and the Counseling Relationship: A Grounded Theory Analysis

ABSTRACT The purpose of this constructivist grounded theory analysis was to explore how adult women with histories of interpersonal trauma experience power within the counseling relationship. Using semi‐structured interviews with 29 clients in counseling, concurrent data analysis and collection resulted in a process theory composed of seven categories and one core category. Categories included Sociocultural Mental Health Factors, Past Experiences of Power, Choosing Counseling, Assessing for Safety and Fit, Advocating for Needs, Reliving Disempowerment , and Reclaiming Power . Participants’ experience of power was summarized by the core category, Practicing Personal Power in Connection with Others , which represented the model's central concepts. The constructed process theory informs counseling practice with clients who have experienced interpersonal trauma by presenting a model for how clients enact their power. Implications include strategies for addressing power within the counseling relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Counseling & Development
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.70000
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power, Interpersonal Trauma, and the Counseling Relationship: A Grounded Theory Analysis

Jenny L. Cureton, Luca Caputo, Cassandra A. Storlie, Sharazazi Dyson
Journal of Counseling & Development
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Power, Interpersonal Trauma, and the Counseling Relationship: A Grounded Theory Analysis

Jenny L. Cureton, Luca Caputo, Cassandra A. Storlie, Sharazazi Dyson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this constructivist grounded theory analysis was to explore how adult women with histories of interpersonal trauma experience power within the counseling relationship. Using semi‐structured interviews with 29 clients in counseling, concurrent data analysis and collection resulted in a process theory composed of seven categories and one core category. Categories included Sociocultural Mental Health Factors, Past Experiences of Power, Choosing Counseling, Assessing for Safety and Fit, Advocating for Needs, Reliving Disempowerment , and Reclaiming Power . Participants’ experience of power was summarized by the core category, Practicing Personal Power in Connection with Others , which represented the model's central concepts. The constructed process theory informs counseling practice with clients who have experienced interpersonal trauma by presenting a model for how clients enact their power. Implications include strategies for addressing power within the counseling relationship.

Journal of Counseling & DevelopmentVol. 103(4)
Kent State University (US), University of Wisconsin–Parkside (US), John Carroll University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.