Socioeconomic Factors Influencing the Growth and Sustainability of the Village Movement

This study offers the first in-depth analysis of the Village Movement since its launch in 2002, examining the socioeconomic and institutional factors behind the growth and sustainability of Villages, community-based organizations that support aging in place. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research combines survey data, case studies, interviews, field observations, and regression analysis. Findings show that Villages are grassroots' responses to the breakdown of traditional social networks in modern, urbanized societies. They help rebuild community ties, reduce isolation, and provide older adults with both services and a renewed sense of purpose. Key drivers of Village development include human capital, civic engagement, spatial proximity, and support from existing organizations. While strong local networks can sometimes reduce the need for Villages, communities with looser ties often have greater motivation to establish them. The study also challenges the perception that Villages are expensive or exclusive. Many operate with low or no membership fees, and alternative models, such as affiliated or hub-and-spoke Villages, allow for growth in lower income and minority communities. Government support, while not essential, can complement Village efforts, particularly during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the Village model proves adaptable and resilient, capable of filling service gaps while strengthening community cohesion. It offers a flexible, community-driven solution to the challenges of aging in a rapidly changing society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aging Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/5295292
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic Factors Influencing the Growth and Sustainability of the Village Movement

Yi-Ting Chiu
1 citations
Journal of Aging Research
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
article

Socioeconomic Factors Influencing the Growth and Sustainability of the Village Movement

Yi-Ting Chiu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study offers the first in-depth analysis of the Village Movement since its launch in 2002, examining the socioeconomic and institutional factors behind the growth and sustainability of Villages, community-based organizations that support aging in place. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research combines survey data, case studies, interviews, field observations, and regression analysis. Findings show that Villages are grassroots' responses to the breakdown of traditional social networks in modern, urbanized societies. They help rebuild community ties, reduce isolation, and provide older adults with both services and a renewed sense of purpose. Key drivers of Village development include human capital, civic engagement, spatial proximity, and support from existing organizations. While strong local networks can sometimes reduce the need for Villages, communities with looser ties often have greater motivation to establish them. The study also challenges the perception that Villages are expensive or exclusive. Many operate with low or no membership fees, and alternative models, such as affiliated or hub-and-spoke Villages, allow for growth in lower income and minority communities. Government support, while not essential, can complement Village efforts, particularly during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the Village model proves adaptable and resilient, capable of filling service gaps while strengthening community cohesion. It offers a flexible, community-driven solution to the challenges of aging in a rapidly changing society.

Journal of Aging ResearchVol. 2025(1)
George Mason University (US)
George Mason University, Charles Koch Foundation, National Cheng Kung University
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Community Development and Social Impact
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.