Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and God

This article offers a theological account of creativity in light of recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models. Drawing on scripture and the philosophical work of Margaret Boden, it argues that creativity—whether divine, human, or computational—is best understood as a moral category. After introducing theologically appropriate forms of analogy, the essay distinguishes between two kinds of divine creativity: creativity ex nihilo (creating from nothing) and creativity in imago (creating in the image of God). These serve as interpretive lenses for assessing human and computational creativity. While AI systems like ChatGPT can produce outputs that are novel, surprising, and valuable, they cannot create ex nihilo or bear the divine image. Their creativity is real but limited, acquiring moral significance only when guided by human agents acting in imago . The final section explores how morally responsible creativity involves accountability, self-formation, and questioning—traits exemplified (in varying degrees of success) in scripture by figures such as Adam, Eve, and Mary, the mother of Jesus. The article concludes that divine creativity is not only the origin but also the ethical standard by which all creativity, including our engagement with AI, should be measured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Christian Ethics
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09539468251347501
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and God

Edward A. David
Studies in Christian Ethics
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and God

Edward A. David
article en

Abstract

This article offers a theological account of creativity in light of recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models. Drawing on scripture and the philosophical work of Margaret Boden, it argues that creativity—whether divine, human, or computational—is best understood as a moral category. After introducing theologically appropriate forms of analogy, the essay distinguishes between two kinds of divine creativity: creativity ex nihilo (creating from nothing) and creativity in imago (creating in the image of God). These serve as interpretive lenses for assessing human and computational creativity. While AI systems like ChatGPT can produce outputs that are novel, surprising, and valuable, they cannot create ex nihilo or bear the divine image. Their creativity is real but limited, acquiring moral significance only when guided by human agents acting in imago . The final section explores how morally responsible creativity involves accountability, self-formation, and questioning—traits exemplified (in varying degrees of success) in scripture by figures such as Adam, Eve, and Mary, the mother of Jesus. The article concludes that divine creativity is not only the origin but also the ethical standard by which all creativity, including our engagement with AI, should be measured.

Studies in Christian EthicsVol. 38(3)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and God — Edward A. David · Studies in Christian Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS