Effects of Ground-Based Forest Operations on Aboveground and Belowground Growth of Seedlings

Ground-based forest operations can produce an intense level of soil disturbance and hamper the growth of seedlings. However, previous studies on the topic of seedling growth performance on the skid trail network showed high variability and non-uniform responses. Therefore, a multivariate meta-analysis was applied to investigate the effects of soil disturbance after ground-based forest operations on the aboveground and belowground growth of seedlings. We further assessed the effects of the following moderators: type of regeneration, type of stand, number of years since the forest operations, mass of the machine used, number of machine passes in the investigated skid trails, and the increased soil compaction in the skid trails. The results supported our hypothesis that ground-based forest operations had a greater effect on the growth of broadleaf species and natural regeneration. This was, however, mostly true for belowground growth, that was typically more affected than aboveground growth. We discovered that there is a recovery in seedling biomass and lenght following harvesting, but this is a long process that requires about ten to twenty years to begin. We found that the number of machine passes and the machine mass did not directly correspond to a higher level of impact, indicating that the actual disturbance drivers are more complicated interactions that occur among the machine, the way in which forest operations are carried out, and the soil properties. It was finally demonstrated that soil compaction was the primary cause of disturbance to seedling growth, primarily affecting belowground biomass and lenght. In particular, we identified a minimum threshold of a 30% increase in soil bulk density to observe statistically significant negative effects on seedling belowground growth. Soil compaction proved to be the main factor that can jeopardize the development of forest regeneration in the skid trails. This suggests that the same best management practices that are used to reduce soil compaction caused by machinery should also be used to reduce the detrimental effects of ground-based forest operations on seedling development. As future research directions, long-term studies are recommended to assess the recovery process dynamics. Moreover, more research on broadleaf, natural regeneration, and Cut-to-Length machinery is strongly suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Croatian journal of forest engineering
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5552/crojfe.2025.3720
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seedling growth and survival studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Ground-Based Forest Operations on Aboveground and Belowground Growth of Seedlings

Ivica Papa, Farzam Tavankar, Rodolfo Picchio, Rachele Venanzi et al.
1 citations
Croatian journal of forest engineering
Seedling growth and survival studies
2.31
article

Effects of Ground-Based Forest Operations on Aboveground and Belowground Growth of Seedlings

Ivica Papa, Farzam Tavankar, Rodolfo Picchio, Rachele Venanzi, Andreja Đuka, Andrea Rosario Proto, Francesco Latterini, Marcin Krzysztof Dyderski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ground-based forest operations can produce an intense level of soil disturbance and hamper the growth of seedlings. However, previous studies on the topic of seedling growth performance on the skid trail network showed high variability and non-uniform responses. Therefore, a multivariate meta-analysis was applied to investigate the effects of soil disturbance after ground-based forest operations on the aboveground and belowground growth of seedlings. We further assessed the effects of the following moderators: type of regeneration, type of stand, number of years since the forest operations, mass of the machine used, number of machine passes in the investigated skid trails, and the increased soil compaction in the skid trails. The results supported our hypothesis that ground-based forest operations had a greater effect on the growth of broadleaf species and natural regeneration. This was, however, mostly true for belowground growth, that was typically more affected than aboveground growth. We discovered that there is a recovery in seedling biomass and lenght following harvesting, but this is a long process that requires about ten to twenty years to begin. We found that the number of machine passes and the machine mass did not directly correspond to a higher level of impact, indicating that the actual disturbance drivers are more complicated interactions that occur among the machine, the way in which forest operations are carried out, and the soil properties. It was finally demonstrated that soil compaction was the primary cause of disturbance to seedling growth, primarily affecting belowground biomass and lenght. In particular, we identified a minimum threshold of a 30% increase in soil bulk density to observe statistically significant negative effects on seedling belowground growth. Soil compaction proved to be the main factor that can jeopardize the development of forest regeneration in the skid trails. This suggests that the same best management practices that are used to reduce soil compaction caused by machinery should also be used to reduce the detrimental effects of ground-based forest operations on seedling development. As future research directions, long-term studies are recommended to assess the recovery process dynamics. Moreover, more research on broadleaf, natural regeneration, and Cut-to-Length machinery is strongly suggested.

Croatian journal of forest engineeringVol. 46(2)
Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR), Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), University of Zagreb (HR), Mediterranean University (ME), Institute of Dendrology (PL), University of Reggio Calabria (IT), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Seedling growth and survival studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.