Having a Disability Doesn't Mean You Have to Get Over It; It Means You Need Help (I-Deals) For Building Sustainable Career

Although academic researchers are becoming more conscious of the beneficial impact that idiosyncratic deals (I-deals) have on a person life, there is a lack of knowledge about the potential implications that I-deals may have on the effort and job consequences of workers with disabilities, a population that is neglected and little researched. It underscores the notion that while a handicap may constitute an aspect of an individual's identity, it does not delineate their talents or potential. The emphasis should be on their distinctive skills and abilities—such as innovation, problem-solving skills, discipline, empathy, or any other commendable attribute. Individuals are advocating for a paradigm shift: to recognize people primarily for their skills and achievements, rather than their impairments. This challenges prejudices and fosters an inclusive workplace where individuals are valued for their contributions. The current research makes use of the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory to explore how international consensuses may have an impact on the perceived job capabilities of workers with impairments by reducing deviant behavior, and therefore, their sustainable career in the organization. On top of that, this research is the first of its kind that analyzes the experiences of workers who have a disability in the shape of physical, mental, deaf, dumb, and others, and all in respect to these interactions. Our theories are tested by utilizing data collected from the field from 230 people working for service sectors, especially in the educational sectors of Pakistan. In a nutshell, it has been shown that the detrimental direct impact of i-deals on employees' inclinations to leave their jobs is more pronounced for workers who have physical impairments than it is for workers who do not have disabilities. In addition, the findings suggest that there is a substantial negative indirect impact of I-deals on Sustainable career development via Emotional Exhaustion and Workaholism for all employee categories. As was predicted, we discover that the degree of this indirect impact rises when moving from the situation of having a physical impairment rather than other disabilities type.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for social science archives
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i2.275
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Having a Disability Doesn't Mean You Have to Get Over It; It Means You Need Help (I-Deals) For Building Sustainable Career

Nosheen Pervaiz Awan, Farooq Anwar Bajwa, Khyzer Bin Dost
1 links
Journal for social science archives
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Having a Disability Doesn't Mean You Have to Get Over It; It Means You Need Help (I-Deals) For Building Sustainable Career

Nosheen Pervaiz Awan, Farooq Anwar Bajwa, Khyzer Bin Dost
article en

Abstract

Although academic researchers are becoming more conscious of the beneficial impact that idiosyncratic deals (I-deals) have on a person life, there is a lack of knowledge about the potential implications that I-deals may have on the effort and job consequences of workers with disabilities, a population that is neglected and little researched. It underscores the notion that while a handicap may constitute an aspect of an individual's identity, it does not delineate their talents or potential. The emphasis should be on their distinctive skills and abilities—such as innovation, problem-solving skills, discipline, empathy, or any other commendable attribute. Individuals are advocating for a paradigm shift: to recognize people primarily for their skills and achievements, rather than their impairments. This challenges prejudices and fosters an inclusive workplace where individuals are valued for their contributions. The current research makes use of the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory to explore how international consensuses may have an impact on the perceived job capabilities of workers with impairments by reducing deviant behavior, and therefore, their sustainable career in the organization. On top of that, this research is the first of its kind that analyzes the experiences of workers who have a disability in the shape of physical, mental, deaf, dumb, and others, and all in respect to these interactions. Our theories are tested by utilizing data collected from the field from 230 people working for service sectors, especially in the educational sectors of Pakistan. In a nutshell, it has been shown that the detrimental direct impact of i-deals on employees' inclinations to leave their jobs is more pronounced for workers who have physical impairments than it is for workers who do not have disabilities. In addition, the findings suggest that there is a substantial negative indirect impact of I-deals on Sustainable career development via Emotional Exhaustion and Workaholism for all employee categories. As was predicted, we discover that the degree of this indirect impact rises when moving from the situation of having a physical impairment rather than other disabilities type.

Journal for social science archivesVol. 3(2)
University of Lahore (PK), Nur International University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.