Abstract P1-03-25: Characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and somatic landscape of metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC)

Abstract Background: MpBC is a rare, aggressive subtype with a dismal prognosis. Standard of care treatments are limited and novel therapies are needed. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, characterization of the immune and genomic environments in MpBC is paramount to inform new biomarker-selected strategies. Here, we investigated the TIME and somatic landscape of MpBC. Methods - We retrospectively analyzed de-identified next-generation sequencing data from unique patients with a breast cancer diagnosis (n=13,512) in the Tempus database. We selected patients with MpBC (n=171, 1.3%) and non-MpBC (n=13,341,98.7%) histologies based on clinical documentation reported within 180 days of sample collection. For patients with multiple samples sequenced, the sample closest to the date of reported diagnosis was utilized. Tumors were sequenced with the Tempus xT DNA (648-gene panel) and/or xR RNA assays. Somatic alterations, immune cell infiltration predicted from gene expression patterns, PD-L1 from IHC, TMB (tumor mutational burden), and MSI (microsatellite instability) were evaluated. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson’s Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests assessed statistical significance (p<0.05, q<0.05 for false discovery rate correction for multiple testing). Results: The MpBC and non-MpBC cohorts comprised a diverse population (White, 72% vs 73%, Black/African American, 12% vs 15%, Asian, 7.9% vs 4.4%, Other, 7.9% vs 7.7%) (p=0.5). The median age at diagnosis in the MpBC and non-MpBC cohorts were 61 and 57 years, respectively (p<0.001). Breast cancer receptor subtype distribution for MpBC vs non-MpBC was HR+/HER2- (20% vs 58%), TNBC (72% vs 24%), and HER2+ (1.9% vs 9.2%) (p<0.001). PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10) was higher in the MpBC (35%) vs non-MbBC group (14%) (p<0.001). In MpBC, the proportion of M1 macrophages and neutrophils was higher vs non-MpBC (p<0.001 for both), and the proportion of B and NK cells was lower (p<0.001 for both). There was no clinically significant difference in the percentage of patients with TMB-H or MSI-H status (p>0.05 for both). The top five somatic alterations that were more frequent (q<0.001) in MpBC vs non-MpBC were: TERT (23% vs 1.3%), CDKN2A (23% vs 5.1%), CDKN2B (21% vs 5.1%), MTAP (16% vs 3.3%), and PIK3R1 (13% vs 3%). Additional potentially therapeutic-relevant alterations associated with PI3k pathway were prevalent in the MpBC and non-MpBC groups: PTEN (25% vs 10%, q<0.001), PIK3CA (26% vs 32%, q=0.2) and AKT1 (1.8% vs 3.7%, q=0.3). Within the MpBC group, there was a similar incidence of PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10) in both TNBC (38%) and HR+/HER2- subtypes (33%). No significant difference was observed between the immune cell subsets within MpBC subtypes (p>0.05). Somatic alterations between TNBC and HR+/HER2- subtypes in the MpBC group were analyzed and there was a trend towards differences in PIK3CA (23% vs 39%) and PTEN (22% vs 33%) (q=0.6 for both). Conclusion: In this large, real-world analysis, patients with MpBC displayed a distinct molecular phenotype compared to non-MpBC patients. In patients with MpBC, TNBC was more common, whereas the HER2+ subtype was rare. Patients with MpBC had higher PD-L1 expression and therapeutically relevant alterations, including those within the PI3k pathway, were frequently encountered in MpBC. Although limited by sample size, this is one of the first studies to compare the molecular phenotypes between subtypes within MpBC. These findings are hypothesis-generating and provide further rationale for developing novel combinatorial therapeutic clinical trial strategies for MpBC. Citation Format: Shaveta Vinayak, Lynn Symonds, Eric Konnick, Natasha Hunter, William Gwin, Denise Shieh, Matina Fragkogianni, Michelle Harris, Jacob Mercer, Hannah Linden, Jennifer Specht. Characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and somatic landscape of metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024; 2024 Dec 10-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-25.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs24-p1-03-25
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P1-03-25: Characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and somatic landscape of metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC)

Jacob Mercer, Eric Quentin Konnick, Hannah M. Linden, Jennifer M. Specht et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Abstract P1-03-25: Characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and somatic landscape of metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC)

Jacob Mercer, Eric Quentin Konnick, Hannah M. Linden, Jennifer M. Specht, William R. Gwin, Denise Shieh, Lynn Symonds, Matina Fragkogianni, Natasha Hunter, Michelle Harris, Shaveta Vinayak
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: MpBC is a rare, aggressive subtype with a dismal prognosis. Standard of care treatments are limited and novel therapies are needed. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, characterization of the immune and genomic environments in MpBC is paramount to inform new biomarker-selected strategies. Here, we investigated the TIME and somatic landscape of MpBC. Methods - We retrospectively analyzed de-identified next-generation sequencing data from unique patients with a breast cancer diagnosis (n=13,512) in the Tempus database. We selected patients with MpBC (n=171, 1.3%) and non-MpBC (n=13,341,98.7%) histologies based on clinical documentation reported within 180 days of sample collection. For patients with multiple samples sequenced, the sample closest to the date of reported diagnosis was utilized. Tumors were sequenced with the Tempus xT DNA (648-gene panel) and/or xR RNA assays. Somatic alterations, immune cell infiltration predicted from gene expression patterns, PD-L1 from IHC, TMB (tumor mutational burden), and MSI (microsatellite instability) were evaluated. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson’s Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests assessed statistical significance (p<0.05, q<0.05 for false discovery rate correction for multiple testing). Results: The MpBC and non-MpBC cohorts comprised a diverse population (White, 72% vs 73%, Black/African American, 12% vs 15%, Asian, 7.9% vs 4.4%, Other, 7.9% vs 7.7%) (p=0.5). The median age at diagnosis in the MpBC and non-MpBC cohorts were 61 and 57 years, respectively (p<0.001). Breast cancer receptor subtype distribution for MpBC vs non-MpBC was HR+/HER2- (20% vs 58%), TNBC (72% vs 24%), and HER2+ (1.9% vs 9.2%) (p<0.001). PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10) was higher in the MpBC (35%) vs non-MbBC group (14%) (p<0.001). In MpBC, the proportion of M1 macrophages and neutrophils was higher vs non-MpBC (p<0.001 for both), and the proportion of B and NK cells was lower (p<0.001 for both). There was no clinically significant difference in the percentage of patients with TMB-H or MSI-H status (p>0.05 for both). The top five somatic alterations that were more frequent (q<0.001) in MpBC vs non-MpBC were: TERT (23% vs 1.3%), CDKN2A (23% vs 5.1%), CDKN2B (21% vs 5.1%), MTAP (16% vs 3.3%), and PIK3R1 (13% vs 3%). Additional potentially therapeutic-relevant alterations associated with PI3k pathway were prevalent in the MpBC and non-MpBC groups: PTEN (25% vs 10%, q<0.001), PIK3CA (26% vs 32%, q=0.2) and AKT1 (1.8% vs 3.7%, q=0.3). Within the MpBC group, there was a similar incidence of PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10) in both TNBC (38%) and HR+/HER2- subtypes (33%). No significant difference was observed between the immune cell subsets within MpBC subtypes (p>0.05). Somatic alterations between TNBC and HR+/HER2- subtypes in the MpBC group were analyzed and there was a trend towards differences in PIK3CA (23% vs 39%) and PTEN (22% vs 33%) (q=0.6 for both). Conclusion: In this large, real-world analysis, patients with MpBC displayed a distinct molecular phenotype compared to non-MpBC patients. In patients with MpBC, TNBC was more common, whereas the HER2+ subtype was rare. Patients with MpBC had higher PD-L1 expression and therapeutically relevant alterations, including those within the PI3k pathway, were frequently encountered in MpBC. Although limited by sample size, this is one of the first studies to compare the molecular phenotypes between subtypes within MpBC. These findings are hypothesis-generating and provide further rationale for developing novel combinatorial therapeutic clinical trial strategies for MpBC. Citation Format: Shaveta Vinayak, Lynn Symonds, Eric Konnick, Natasha Hunter, William Gwin, Denise Shieh, Matina Fragkogianni, Michelle Harris, Jacob Mercer, Hannah Linden, Jennifer Specht. Characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and somatic landscape of metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024; 2024 Dec 10-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-25.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 31(12_Supplement)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.