Teachers' Autonomy Support in Reading: A Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis Approach

ABSTRACT Reading and reading comprehension are crucial skills, yet many primary school students struggle. To address this, fostering both the skill and will for reading is a central aim in literacy education. Reading motivation is considered a multidimensional construct, including autonomous reading motivation (ARM), driven by personal value and pleasure; controlled reading motivation (CRM), driven by internal or external pressures; and self‐efficacy, reflecting expectations for success. One way to stimulate students' reading motivation, particularly ARM, in school is by giving them autonomy, such as for example offering choices between reading materials. The present study used a person‐centered multilevel latent profile analysis approach to identify reading motivational profiles and their relationship with student demographics and reading comprehension among grade 4 students. The association between students' profile membership and teachers' autonomy‐supportive behavior was furthermore assessed. Four distinct reading motivation profiles were identified. The high‐quality motivation profile, characterized by high ARM, high self‐efficacy, and low CRM, exhibited the highest reading comprehension scores. Students with high ARM, high CRM, and low self‐efficacy showed the lowest reading comprehension scores. In line with our expectations, students in classes with higher levels of perceived autonomy support were less likely to belong to profiles characterized by low and moderate levels of ARM, CRM, and self‐efficacy, and more likely to be in the high‐quality motivation profile. Overall, these findings highlight the complexity of reading motivation and its dynamic relation with reading comprehension. Implications for researchers and educators are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers' Autonomy Support in Reading: A Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis Approach

Hilde Van Keer, Koen Aesaert, Katrijn Denies, Nele Bleukx
1 citations
Reading Research Quarterly
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
2.44
article

Teachers' Autonomy Support in Reading: A Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis Approach

Hilde Van Keer, Koen Aesaert, Katrijn Denies, Nele Bleukx
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reading and reading comprehension are crucial skills, yet many primary school students struggle. To address this, fostering both the skill and will for reading is a central aim in literacy education. Reading motivation is considered a multidimensional construct, including autonomous reading motivation (ARM), driven by personal value and pleasure; controlled reading motivation (CRM), driven by internal or external pressures; and self‐efficacy, reflecting expectations for success. One way to stimulate students' reading motivation, particularly ARM, in school is by giving them autonomy, such as for example offering choices between reading materials. The present study used a person‐centered multilevel latent profile analysis approach to identify reading motivational profiles and their relationship with student demographics and reading comprehension among grade 4 students. The association between students' profile membership and teachers' autonomy‐supportive behavior was furthermore assessed. Four distinct reading motivation profiles were identified. The high‐quality motivation profile, characterized by high ARM, high self‐efficacy, and low CRM, exhibited the highest reading comprehension scores. Students with high ARM, high CRM, and low self‐efficacy showed the lowest reading comprehension scores. In line with our expectations, students in classes with higher levels of perceived autonomy support were less likely to belong to profiles characterized by low and moderate levels of ARM, CRM, and self‐efficacy, and more likely to be in the high‐quality motivation profile. Overall, these findings highlight the complexity of reading motivation and its dynamic relation with reading comprehension. Implications for researchers and educators are discussed.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 60(3)
Ghent University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Vlaamse Overheid
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.