Custom-Designed Approach to Treatment with Algorithms (C-DATA) for Diabetic Macular Edema

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a custom-designed approach to treatment with algorithms (C-DATA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) compared to established published protocols. Design: Prospective, comparative clinical study.Subjects: 33 patients with DME, contributing to 49 distinct eyes treated.Methods: Patients were treated according to the C-DATA algorithm, which guided the selection and timing of intravitreal injections, subtenon injections, and focal grid laser therapy based on individual patient characteristics and treatment responses.Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), were performed at each visit.Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity, treatment frequency, and patient dropout rate.Results: Eyes treated with C-DATA showed a mean improvement of 14.7 letters over an average follow-up period of 37.2 months, compared to 8.2 letters for eyes treated with standard protocols.71.4% of C-DATA-treated eyes improved, gaining an average of 22.14 letters.C-DATA required an average of 2.6 treatments per year, compared to 10.6 treatments per year for regimented protocols.The dropout rate for C-DATA was 1.9%, versus 11.4% for standard protocols. Conclusions:The C-DATA approach for DME management demonstrated superior visual acuity outcomes, significantly reduced treatment burden, and enhanced patient compliance compared to traditional regimented protocols.These findings suggest that personalized, algorithm-based treatment strategies may optimize DME management and improve long-term patient outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ocular Biology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13188/2334-2838.1000034
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Custom-Designed Approach to Treatment with Algorithms (C-DATA) for Diabetic Macular Edema

Nabil M. Jabbour
Journal of Ocular Biology
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Custom-Designed Approach to Treatment with Algorithms (C-DATA) for Diabetic Macular Edema

Nabil M. Jabbour
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a custom-designed approach to treatment with algorithms (C-DATA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) compared to established published protocols. Design: Prospective, comparative clinical study.Subjects: 33 patients with DME, contributing to 49 distinct eyes treated.Methods: Patients were treated according to the C-DATA algorithm, which guided the selection and timing of intravitreal injections, subtenon injections, and focal grid laser therapy based on individual patient characteristics and treatment responses.Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), were performed at each visit.Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity, treatment frequency, and patient dropout rate.Results: Eyes treated with C-DATA showed a mean improvement of 14.7 letters over an average follow-up period of 37.2 months, compared to 8.2 letters for eyes treated with standard protocols.71.4% of C-DATA-treated eyes improved, gaining an average of 22.14 letters.C-DATA required an average of 2.6 treatments per year, compared to 10.6 treatments per year for regimented protocols.The dropout rate for C-DATA was 1.9%, versus 11.4% for standard protocols. Conclusions:The C-DATA approach for DME management demonstrated superior visual acuity outcomes, significantly reduced treatment burden, and enhanced patient compliance compared to traditional regimented protocols.These findings suggest that personalized, algorithm-based treatment strategies may optimize DME management and improve long-term patient outcomes.

Journal of Ocular BiologyVol. 9(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.