Does peace research need knowledge on social policy?

Peace Research and Social Policy are linked both conceptually and causally. Concepts such as structural violence and positive peace connect elements of the two disciplines, as Social Policy, by definition, focuses on how societies across the world meet human needs for security, education, work, health, and well-being – i.e., elements of a structurally nonviolent condition. The causal analysis of intrastate conflict, in particular, further links the foci of Peace Studies and Social Policy, as many of the grievances addressed by social policies tend to lead to conflict. Globally, horizontal inequalities are causally associated with conflict, while in the MENA region, conflicts are strongly linked to corrupt state factionalism – a condition in which the state becomes an instrument of only some subnational groups, while corrupt practices marginalize others. This forum article focuses on the conceptual and empirical linkages between Social Policy and Peace Research, demonstrates why these fields of research need each other, and reveals temporal variation in the extent to which findings from Social Policy have been mobilized in the study of peace and conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Social Policy
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181251348871
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does peace research need knowledge on social policy?

Timo Kivimäki
1 citations
Global Social Policy
Peacebuilding and International Security
4.20
article

Does peace research need knowledge on social policy?

Timo Kivimäki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Peace Research and Social Policy are linked both conceptually and causally. Concepts such as structural violence and positive peace connect elements of the two disciplines, as Social Policy, by definition, focuses on how societies across the world meet human needs for security, education, work, health, and well-being – i.e., elements of a structurally nonviolent condition. The causal analysis of intrastate conflict, in particular, further links the foci of Peace Studies and Social Policy, as many of the grievances addressed by social policies tend to lead to conflict. Globally, horizontal inequalities are causally associated with conflict, while in the MENA region, conflicts are strongly linked to corrupt state factionalism – a condition in which the state becomes an instrument of only some subnational groups, while corrupt practices marginalize others. This forum article focuses on the conceptual and empirical linkages between Social Policy and Peace Research, demonstrates why these fields of research need each other, and reveals temporal variation in the extent to which findings from Social Policy have been mobilized in the study of peace and conflict.

Global Social PolicyVol. 25(3)
University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Peacebuilding and International Security
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does peace research need knowledge on social policy? — Timo Kivimäki · Global Social Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS