Clinical audit of Ankylos implant abutment fractures for a ten-year period in practice

Introduction Abutment fracture is a clinical problem which can lead to loss of an implant.Aim To compare abutment fracture rate in the authors' practice against published data and identify any risk factors.Methods The published literature on the subject was reviewed and a retrospective ten-year clinical audit was conducted to determine the rate of implant abutment fracture for all single-unit, Ankylos, screw-retained implants restored on a titanium base.Results The abutment fracture rate obtained from the literature was 2.2%, with a specific Ankylos rate of 1.8%. The overall abutment fracture rate in practice during the audited ten-year period was 0.6%, with the following contributing factors identified: male patients (62%), first molar site (84% were at first molar sites), implant restoration opposing a natural tooth (89%), implant bound by another tooth/implant (64%), implant functioning for approximately six years before fracture and a gonial angle of <120°.Conclusion The fracture rate from the audit was 1.6% lower than that obtained from the literature search and 1.2% lower than that set specifically for Ankylos implants in the published literature. Risk factors were identified which should be considered when planning and consenting cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BDJ
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-8009-0
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical audit of Ankylos implant abutment fractures for a ten-year period in practice

Mark Packer, Brian Millar, Sally Rayment
BDJ
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Clinical audit of Ankylos implant abutment fractures for a ten-year period in practice

Mark Packer, Brian Millar, Sally Rayment
article en

Abstract

Introduction Abutment fracture is a clinical problem which can lead to loss of an implant.Aim To compare abutment fracture rate in the authors' practice against published data and identify any risk factors.Methods The published literature on the subject was reviewed and a retrospective ten-year clinical audit was conducted to determine the rate of implant abutment fracture for all single-unit, Ankylos, screw-retained implants restored on a titanium base.Results The abutment fracture rate obtained from the literature was 2.2%, with a specific Ankylos rate of 1.8%. The overall abutment fracture rate in practice during the audited ten-year period was 0.6%, with the following contributing factors identified: male patients (62%), first molar site (84% were at first molar sites), implant restoration opposing a natural tooth (89%), implant bound by another tooth/implant (64%), implant functioning for approximately six years before fracture and a gonial angle of <120°.Conclusion The fracture rate from the audit was 1.6% lower than that obtained from the literature search and 1.2% lower than that set specifically for Ankylos implants in the published literature. Risk factors were identified which should be considered when planning and consenting cases.

BDJVol. 238(11)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.