NATO Framework for Modeling and Simulation of Human Lethality, Injury, and Impairment From Blast-Related Threats and Its Practical Implementation to Support Blast Injury Research

Abstract Blast-related trauma was the predominate source of casualties within Iraq and Afghanistan and has maintained in the Ukraine conflict. Computational modeling is anticipated to accelerate discovery of novel solutions for mitigating injuries and reduce costs in research and development. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) saw the future value in a comprehensive, whole human blast effects modeling capability to counter emerging blast threats resulting in establishment of a research technical group (RTG) to develop a framework for the capability. The RTG performed a literature review demonstrating the lack of such a capability along with the necessary pieces needed for a framework. RTG development framework consists of: Model 1 Threat characterization: generates a computational representation of the blast-threat; Module 2 Biophysics: produces the relevant loading profile and predicts biomechanical, pathophysiological, and neurological responses; Module X Injury Prediction and Medical Diagnosis: provides predictions on injuries (e.g., fracture) and Module Y Medical Outcomes provides understanding of the clinical consequences (e.g., functional incapacitation) of those injuries. The framework can assist in mitigating blast injuries and their consequences on Service Member readiness. Key hurdles to its development include a lack of high rate material characteristics and siloed model development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068927
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NATO Framework for Modeling and Simulation of Human Lethality, Injury, and Impairment From Blast-Related Threats and Its Practical Implementation to Support Blast Injury Research

Levent Turhan, Atıl Erdik, Pınar Yılgör Huri, Philippe May et al.
2 links
Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
Disaster Response and Management
article

NATO Framework for Modeling and Simulation of Human Lethality, Injury, and Impairment From Blast-Related Threats and Its Practical Implementation to Support Blast Injury Research

Levent Turhan, Atıl Erdik, Pınar Yılgör Huri, Philippe May, Mattias K. Sköld, Tyson Josey, Ibolja Černak, Tomer Erlich, Anthony C. Santago, Axel Franke, Dan Bieler, David Reinecke, Raj K. Gupta, Mårten Risling, M.M.G.M. Philippens, Avi Yitzhak, Amit Bagchi, Ilker Kurtoglu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Blast-related trauma was the predominate source of casualties within Iraq and Afghanistan and has maintained in the Ukraine conflict. Computational modeling is anticipated to accelerate discovery of novel solutions for mitigating injuries and reduce costs in research and development. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) saw the future value in a comprehensive, whole human blast effects modeling capability to counter emerging blast threats resulting in establishment of a research technical group (RTG) to develop a framework for the capability. The RTG performed a literature review demonstrating the lack of such a capability along with the necessary pieces needed for a framework. RTG development framework consists of: Model 1 Threat characterization: generates a computational representation of the blast-threat; Module 2 Biophysics: produces the relevant loading profile and predicts biomechanical, pathophysiological, and neurological responses; Module X Injury Prediction and Medical Diagnosis: provides predictions on injuries (e.g., fracture) and Module Y Medical Outcomes provides understanding of the clinical consequences (e.g., functional incapacitation) of those injuries. The framework can assist in mitigating blast injuries and their consequences on Service Member readiness. Key hurdles to its development include a lack of high rate material characteristics and siloed model development.

Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and TherapyVol. 8(4)
United States Naval Research Laboratory (US), Defence Research and Development Canada (CA), Walmart (United States) (US), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Ankara University (TR), Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TR), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA), Ministère des Armées (FR), Assuta Medical Center (IL), United States Army Medical Research and Development Command (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Milli Savunma Üniversitesi (TR), NTI University (NL), CorSolutions (United States) (US), Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IL), Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz (DE), Mitre (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.