Using the P-CaRES Tool to Identify Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Life-Limiting Diseases: An Analysis of Internal Medicine Admissions

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Early integration of palliative care (PC) improves outcomes for patients with life-limiting diseases (LLDs). This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) tool-originally developed for emergency settings-in identifying unmet PC needs among patients admitted to internal medicine wards. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, the P-CaRES tool was applied to medical records of patients with LLDs. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from charts. Logistic regression identified predictors of PC receipt; survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests. <b>Results:</b> Among 2509 patients screened, 631 (23.9%) had at least one LLD. Of these, 451 (71.5%) were identified as having PC needs. However, only 132 (20.9%) received PC services-126 with documented need and 6 without. Advanced cancer (OR = 6.46, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a positive response to the surprise question (OR = 4.88, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and frequent hospitalizations (OR = 2.24, <i>p</i> < 0.001) predicted PC receipt. Median survival declined with increasing disease burden (10 vs. 372 days for patients with ≥3 vs. 1 LLD), unmet PC needs (85 vs. 1383 days), and a "yes" response to the surprise question (79 vs. 1598 days) (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The P-CaRES tool effectively identified PC needs in patients with LLDs, including those with cancer. Clinical indicators such as frequent hospital admissions, a positive response to the surprise question, and multimorbidity predicted both the need for PC and shorter survival. Nonetheless, substantial gaps existed between identified needs and PC delivery-especially for non-cancer patients. Structured screening and timely referrals may bridge this gap and improve care for seriously ill individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the P-CaRES Tool to Identify Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Life-Limiting Diseases: An Analysis of Internal Medicine Admissions

H. Stettner, Eva Katharina Masel, Raphael van Tulder, Nguyen‐Son Le et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.88
article

Using the P-CaRES Tool to Identify Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Life-Limiting Diseases: An Analysis of Internal Medicine Admissions

H. Stettner, Eva Katharina Masel, Raphael van Tulder, Nguyen‐Son Le, Josef Singer, Claudia Fischer, Gudrun Kreye, Rudolf Likar, Eleonora Meran, Luise Fidelsberger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Early integration of palliative care (PC) improves outcomes for patients with life-limiting diseases (LLDs). This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) tool-originally developed for emergency settings-in identifying unmet PC needs among patients admitted to internal medicine wards. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, the P-CaRES tool was applied to medical records of patients with LLDs. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from charts. Logistic regression identified predictors of PC receipt; survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests. <b>Results:</b> Among 2509 patients screened, 631 (23.9%) had at least one LLD. Of these, 451 (71.5%) were identified as having PC needs. However, only 132 (20.9%) received PC services-126 with documented need and 6 without. Advanced cancer (OR = 6.46, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a positive response to the surprise question (OR = 4.88, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and frequent hospitalizations (OR = 2.24, <i>p</i> < 0.001) predicted PC receipt. Median survival declined with increasing disease burden (10 vs. 372 days for patients with ≥3 vs. 1 LLD), unmet PC needs (85 vs. 1383 days), and a "yes" response to the surprise question (79 vs. 1598 days) (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The P-CaRES tool effectively identified PC needs in patients with LLDs, including those with cancer. Clinical indicators such as frequent hospital admissions, a positive response to the surprise question, and multimorbidity predicted both the need for PC and shorter survival. Nonetheless, substantial gaps existed between identified needs and PC delivery-especially for non-cancer patients. Structured screening and timely referrals may bridge this gap and improve care for seriously ill individuals.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(12)
Klinikum Klagenfurt (AT), Universitätsklinikum Krems (AT), Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (AT), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT), University of Klagenfurt (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.