Race and Prejudice in Erik Erikson’s Childhood and Society

Abstract: Erik H. Erikson is widely appreciated as a theorist of the life cycle, identity, and psychohistory. But in Childhood and Society (1963[1950]), Erikson also did innovative work in the borderland of psychoanalysis and anthropology—cultural work that is often acknowledged but seldom examined closely. I explore Erikson’s elusive way of thinking about racial prejudice, identity, and internalized racism in the context of majority-minority dynamics. Childhood and Society was ahead of its time in its understanding of cultural trauma and in its empathic focus on the exclusion of racialized minorities in American democracy. An immigrant who himself possessed a divided identity, Erikson understood cultural and developmental barriers to dignity. Yet his work on Jewish culture, post-genocidal native Americans, and Black Americans under segregation also shows the limitations of the white liberalism of his time. Though Erikson made daring use of participant observation and added social context to Freudian thinking, he also drew on and arguably perpetuated racial and ethnic stereotypes. An admirer of Franklin D. Roosevelt rather than Karl Marx, Erikson reflected the promise and perils of Western cosmopolitanism—especially its certainty that psychoanalysis could provide a universal basis for inquiry into difference in a racialized society.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American imago
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2025.a962859
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Theological Perspectives and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Race and Prejudice in Erik Erikson’s Childhood and Society

John Martin-Joy
1 citations
American imago
Theological Perspectives and Practices
4.20
article

Race and Prejudice in Erik Erikson’s Childhood and Society

John Martin-Joy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Erik H. Erikson is widely appreciated as a theorist of the life cycle, identity, and psychohistory. But in Childhood and Society (1963[1950]), Erikson also did innovative work in the borderland of psychoanalysis and anthropology—cultural work that is often acknowledged but seldom examined closely. I explore Erikson’s elusive way of thinking about racial prejudice, identity, and internalized racism in the context of majority-minority dynamics. Childhood and Society was ahead of its time in its understanding of cultural trauma and in its empathic focus on the exclusion of racialized minorities in American democracy. An immigrant who himself possessed a divided identity, Erikson understood cultural and developmental barriers to dignity. Yet his work on Jewish culture, post-genocidal native Americans, and Black Americans under segregation also shows the limitations of the white liberalism of his time. Though Erikson made daring use of participant observation and added social context to Freudian thinking, he also drew on and arguably perpetuated racial and ethnic stereotypes. An admirer of Franklin D. Roosevelt rather than Karl Marx, Erikson reflected the promise and perils of Western cosmopolitanism—especially its certainty that psychoanalysis could provide a universal basis for inquiry into difference in a racialized society.

American imagoVol. 82(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Theological Perspectives and Practices
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.