Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum Block and Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Single-Port Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Regional anesthesia is a key component of multimodal analgesia following minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. However, single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery differs anatomically and physiologically from multiport or open approaches, particularly in terms of incision site, tissue handling, and pain characteristics. Despite its increasing use, evidence supporting procedure-specific regional analgesic protocols for this approach remains limited. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) in this surgical context. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: In this randomized controlled trial, 68 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery were randomly assigned to receive either QLB or RSB at the end of surgery. Four patients were excluded due to missing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) data, resulting in 64 patients analyzed (QLB group: <i>n</i> = 32; RSB group: <i>n</i> = 32). The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption over the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included interval-based opioid consumption, time to first PCA bolus, postoperative pain scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). <i>Results</i>: The RSB group demonstrated significantly lower cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively (132.9 [61.3, 338.4] µg vs. 453.0 [253.1, 811.0] µg, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This trend persisted across most postoperative time points up to 48 h. Interval-based opioid consumption was also lower in the RSB group during 0-24 h and 32-48 h intervals (each comparison <i>p</i> < 0.05). The time to first PCA bolus was significantly longer in the RSB group (56.5 [41.0, 340.3] minutes vs. 40.5 [33.3, 68.8] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.014), and Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a delayed first bolus request in the RSB group (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.007). Pain scores and postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence were comparable between groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: Compared with QLB, RSB provided similar pain relief with significantly lower opioid consumption following single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery. These findings highlight the potential advantages of RSB in enhancing analgesic efficiency and support the development of procedure-specific regional analgesia protocols tailored to this surgical approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061084
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum Block and Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Single-Port Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyun‐Jung Shin, Dongju Kim, Jihyun Chung, Seunguk Bang et al.
1 citations
Medicina
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum Block and Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Single-Port Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyun‐Jung Shin, Dongju Kim, Jihyun Chung, Seunguk Bang, Y. J. Park, Youngin Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Regional anesthesia is a key component of multimodal analgesia following minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. However, single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery differs anatomically and physiologically from multiport or open approaches, particularly in terms of incision site, tissue handling, and pain characteristics. Despite its increasing use, evidence supporting procedure-specific regional analgesic protocols for this approach remains limited. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) in this surgical context. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: In this randomized controlled trial, 68 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery were randomly assigned to receive either QLB or RSB at the end of surgery. Four patients were excluded due to missing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) data, resulting in 64 patients analyzed (QLB group: <i>n</i> = 32; RSB group: <i>n</i> = 32). The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption over the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included interval-based opioid consumption, time to first PCA bolus, postoperative pain scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). <i>Results</i>: The RSB group demonstrated significantly lower cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively (132.9 [61.3, 338.4] µg vs. 453.0 [253.1, 811.0] µg, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This trend persisted across most postoperative time points up to 48 h. Interval-based opioid consumption was also lower in the RSB group during 0-24 h and 32-48 h intervals (each comparison <i>p</i> < 0.05). The time to first PCA bolus was significantly longer in the RSB group (56.5 [41.0, 340.3] minutes vs. 40.5 [33.3, 68.8] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.014), and Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a delayed first bolus request in the RSB group (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.007). Pain scores and postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence were comparable between groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: Compared with QLB, RSB provided similar pain relief with significantly lower opioid consumption following single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery. These findings highlight the potential advantages of RSB in enhancing analgesic efficiency and support the development of procedure-specific regional analgesia protocols tailored to this surgical approach.

MedicinaVol. 61(6)
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), The Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), St Mary's Hospital (GB), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.