Evaluating sawdust-based bioethanol and pyrolysis products in the European Union: Feedstock availability, life cycle assessment, and techno-economic analysis

The significance of biomass-derived biofuels in global transport is increasing due to their perceived environmental advantages and policies with binding use targets. This study conducted a comprehensive sustainability analysis of sawdust-based bioethanol in the European Union, encompassing evaluations of sawdust availability, techno-economic assessment (TEA), and global warming potential (GWP), including land use and land-use-change-related GWP (GWP-LULUC). It was found that bioethanol production based on average annual sawdust potential could replace only 0.5 % of total fuel consumption in the EU transport sector in 2021, provided that all the sawdust was used for this purpose. The TEA calculations indicated that, while technically feasible, the economics of sawdust-based bioethanol production are not favourable based on this research's assumptions. Pyrolysis-based bioproducts showed better profitability. The economics of bioethanol production depends greatly on the sawdust cost, which was shown by the sensitivity analysis conducted. The GWP results highlighted the potential environmental benefits of ethanol-blended fuels such as E20 (20 % bioethanol with gasoline) and E85 (85 % bioethanol with gasoline), demonstrating reductions of 18 % and 78 % in fossil GWP impacts compared to petrol respectively. Examining GWP-LULUC unveiled a notable sequestration effect, primarily due to increased carbon storage in forests. However, these effects vary depending on the production year, country of origin, or soil type. In the context of this study, sawdust-based bioethanol demonstrated the potential to replace some fossil fuels, offering technical feasibility and considerable environmental benefits. However, it is not economically feasible and is highly influenced by policy changes and competition among different sectors. • Sawdust-based bioethanol could replace less than 0.5 % of total fuel consumption in EU. • Sawdust-based bioethanol is technically feasible but economically very demanding. • Bioethanol-blended fuels show benefits in fossil GWP impact reduction. • LULUC based GWP impacts revealed a substantial sequestration effect of bioethanol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108035
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating sawdust-based bioethanol and pyrolysis products in the European Union: Feedstock availability, life cycle assessment, and techno-economic analysis

Pekka Oinas, Kyösti Ruuttunen, Hafiz Usman Ghani, M.M. Khan et al.
6 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Biofuel production and bioconversion
4.04
article

Evaluating sawdust-based bioethanol and pyrolysis products in the European Union: Feedstock availability, life cycle assessment, and techno-economic analysis

Pekka Oinas, Kyösti Ruuttunen, Hafiz Usman Ghani, M.M. Khan, Hannu Ilvesniemi, Perttu Anttila, Ilkka Leinonen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The significance of biomass-derived biofuels in global transport is increasing due to their perceived environmental advantages and policies with binding use targets. This study conducted a comprehensive sustainability analysis of sawdust-based bioethanol in the European Union, encompassing evaluations of sawdust availability, techno-economic assessment (TEA), and global warming potential (GWP), including land use and land-use-change-related GWP (GWP-LULUC). It was found that bioethanol production based on average annual sawdust potential could replace only 0.5 % of total fuel consumption in the EU transport sector in 2021, provided that all the sawdust was used for this purpose. The TEA calculations indicated that, while technically feasible, the economics of sawdust-based bioethanol production are not favourable based on this research's assumptions. Pyrolysis-based bioproducts showed better profitability. The economics of bioethanol production depends greatly on the sawdust cost, which was shown by the sensitivity analysis conducted. The GWP results highlighted the potential environmental benefits of ethanol-blended fuels such as E20 (20 % bioethanol with gasoline) and E85 (85 % bioethanol with gasoline), demonstrating reductions of 18 % and 78 % in fossil GWP impacts compared to petrol respectively. Examining GWP-LULUC unveiled a notable sequestration effect, primarily due to increased carbon storage in forests. However, these effects vary depending on the production year, country of origin, or soil type. In the context of this study, sawdust-based bioethanol demonstrated the potential to replace some fossil fuels, offering technical feasibility and considerable environmental benefits. However, it is not economically feasible and is highly influenced by policy changes and competition among different sectors. • Sawdust-based bioethanol could replace less than 0.5 % of total fuel consumption in EU. • Sawdust-based bioethanol is technically feasible but economically very demanding. • Bioethanol-blended fuels show benefits in fossil GWP impact reduction. • LULUC based GWP impacts revealed a substantial sequestration effect of bioethanol.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 115
Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Business Finland
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
4.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.