Comparison of Accounting Expert Teacher’s Cognitive Skill Model Versus Average Student for Solving Introductory Accounting Equations

Given ongoing challenges in improving introductory accounting students' performance in procedural tasks, this study compares the cognitive skill progression of a state-level expert accounting teacher with that of an average student in solving introductory accounting equations, using Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) learning theory as the framework.ACT-R outlines three stages of skill acquisition: the declarative stage (initial learning), the knowledge compilation stage (transitional refinement), and the procedural stage (mastery).Mastery is achieved when procedural skills dominate, with minimal reliance on declarative knowledge, allowing for automatic and efficient task execution.A qualitative case study methodology was employed in a high school setting, guided by deductive thematic analysis based on ACT-R theory.Data were gathered from two primary sources: document analysis of 26 accounting equation solutions with recorded completion times, and in-depth interviews to probe participants' understanding and reasoning processes.The study identified 12 models of cognitive skill progression, categorized by transaction type, with this paper focusing on two models-'Return of Purchased Inventory' and 'Accrued Expense'selected for their clear cognitive contrasts between teacher and student performance.Findings show that the average student remained largely at the declarative stage, requiring nine ifthen production rules to solve tasks, indicating limited proceduralization.In contrast, the expert teacher demonstrated full procedural mastery, utilizing a single, highly efficient ifthen production rule.Theoretically, this study challenges the behaviorist dominance in accounting education by introducing a cognitive lens for understanding skill development.Practically, it presents a cognitive model highlighting the importance of spaced learning to support retention and the gradual transformation from declarative knowledge into procedural expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v15-i2/25484
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Accounting Expert Teacher’s Cognitive Skill Model Versus Average Student for Solving Introductory Accounting Equations

Nor Aishah Buang, Sheerad Sahid, Mahadhir Mohamed
International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Comparison of Accounting Expert Teacher’s Cognitive Skill Model Versus Average Student for Solving Introductory Accounting Equations

Nor Aishah Buang, Sheerad Sahid, Mahadhir Mohamed
article en

Abstract

Given ongoing challenges in improving introductory accounting students' performance in procedural tasks, this study compares the cognitive skill progression of a state-level expert accounting teacher with that of an average student in solving introductory accounting equations, using Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) learning theory as the framework.ACT-R outlines three stages of skill acquisition: the declarative stage (initial learning), the knowledge compilation stage (transitional refinement), and the procedural stage (mastery).Mastery is achieved when procedural skills dominate, with minimal reliance on declarative knowledge, allowing for automatic and efficient task execution.A qualitative case study methodology was employed in a high school setting, guided by deductive thematic analysis based on ACT-R theory.Data were gathered from two primary sources: document analysis of 26 accounting equation solutions with recorded completion times, and in-depth interviews to probe participants' understanding and reasoning processes.The study identified 12 models of cognitive skill progression, categorized by transaction type, with this paper focusing on two models-'Return of Purchased Inventory' and 'Accrued Expense'selected for their clear cognitive contrasts between teacher and student performance.Findings show that the average student remained largely at the declarative stage, requiring nine ifthen production rules to solve tasks, indicating limited proceduralization.In contrast, the expert teacher demonstrated full procedural mastery, utilizing a single, highly efficient ifthen production rule.Theoretically, this study challenges the behaviorist dominance in accounting education by introducing a cognitive lens for understanding skill development.Practically, it presents a cognitive model highlighting the importance of spaced learning to support retention and the gradual transformation from declarative knowledge into procedural expertise.

International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management SciencesVol. 15(2)
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.