Differences in Urban Innovation Paths: Empirical Evidence Based on a Finite Mixture Model

Innovation is the core driver of high-quality economic development. Based on an innovation analysis framework and using a finite mixture model (FMM), this paper endogenously clusters the innovation paths of 261 cities in China into multiple patterns during the period 2003–2019 and explores the causes of heterogeneity. The study shows significant heterogeneity in Chinese cities’ innovation paths, which can be objectively classified into four paths by the FMM. Meanwhile, three major factors, namely, the innovation foundation, environment, and linkages, play distinguished roles in different innovation paths, and the synergy of the three factors contributes to improving the level of innovation. More importantly, more than 85% of innovation paths are optimized during the study period; upgrading industrial structure, increasing marketization levels, and attracting foreign direct investment help explain the heterogeneity of different innovation paths. Therefore, the innovation foundation, environment, and linkages should be improved to effectively play the synergistic effect on innovation output to help high-quality economic development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jupddm.upeng-5345
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Urban Innovation Paths: Empirical Evidence Based on a Finite Mixture Model

Yang Chen, Lin Cheng, Minghui Jin
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Differences in Urban Innovation Paths: Empirical Evidence Based on a Finite Mixture Model

Yang Chen, Lin Cheng, Minghui Jin
article en

Abstract

Innovation is the core driver of high-quality economic development. Based on an innovation analysis framework and using a finite mixture model (FMM), this paper endogenously clusters the innovation paths of 261 cities in China into multiple patterns during the period 2003–2019 and explores the causes of heterogeneity. The study shows significant heterogeneity in Chinese cities’ innovation paths, which can be objectively classified into four paths by the FMM. Meanwhile, three major factors, namely, the innovation foundation, environment, and linkages, play distinguished roles in different innovation paths, and the synergy of the three factors contributes to improving the level of innovation. More importantly, more than 85% of innovation paths are optimized during the study period; upgrading industrial structure, increasing marketization levels, and attracting foreign direct investment help explain the heterogeneity of different innovation paths. Therefore, the innovation foundation, environment, and linkages should be improved to effectively play the synergistic effect on innovation output to help high-quality economic development.

Journal of Urban Planning and DevelopmentVol. 151(3)
Qingdao University of Science and Technology (CN), Shandong University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.