Generative Framework for Personalized Persuasion: Inferring Causal, Counterfactual, and Latent Knowledge

We hypothesize that optimal system responses emerge from adaptive strategies grounded in causal and counterfactual knowledge.Counterfactual inference allows us to create hypothetical scenarios to examine the effects of alternative system responses.We enhance this process through causal discovery, which identifies the strategies informed by the underlying causal structure that govern system behaviors.Moreover, we consider the psychological constructs and unobservable noises that might be influencing user-system interactions as latent factors.We show that these factors can be effectively estimated.We employ causal discovery to identify strategy-level causal relationships among user and system utterances, guiding the generation of personalized counterfactual dialogues.We model the user utterance strategies as causal factors, enabling system strategies to be treated as counterfactual actions.Furthermore, we optimize policies for selecting system responses based on counterfactual data.Our results using a real-world dataset on social good demonstrate significant improvements in persuasive system outcomes, with increased cumulative rewards validating the efficacy of causal discovery in guiding personalized counterfactual inference and optimizing dialogue policies for a persuasive dialogue system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3699682.3728318
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Framework for Personalized Persuasion: Inferring Causal, Counterfactual, and Latent Knowledge

Kazushi Ikeda, Roberto Legaspi, Peter Spirtes, K. Zhang et al.
1 citations
Media Influence and Health
15.18
article

Generative Framework for Personalized Persuasion: Inferring Causal, Counterfactual, and Latent Knowledge

Kazushi Ikeda, Roberto Legaspi, Peter Spirtes, K. Zhang, Xinshuai Dong, Donghuo Zeng, Yuewen Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We hypothesize that optimal system responses emerge from adaptive strategies grounded in causal and counterfactual knowledge.Counterfactual inference allows us to create hypothetical scenarios to examine the effects of alternative system responses.We enhance this process through causal discovery, which identifies the strategies informed by the underlying causal structure that govern system behaviors.Moreover, we consider the psychological constructs and unobservable noises that might be influencing user-system interactions as latent factors.We show that these factors can be effectively estimated.We employ causal discovery to identify strategy-level causal relationships among user and system utterances, guiding the generation of personalized counterfactual dialogues.We model the user utterance strategies as causal factors, enabling system strategies to be treated as counterfactual actions.Furthermore, we optimize policies for selecting system responses based on counterfactual data.Our results using a real-world dataset on social good demonstrate significant improvements in persuasive system outcomes, with increased cumulative rewards validating the efficacy of causal discovery in guiding personalized counterfactual inference and optimizing dialogue policies for a persuasive dialogue system.

KDDI Research (Japan) (JP), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Influence and Health
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.