Medication Beliefs Regarding P2Y12 Inhibitors: An Exploratory Thematic and Semantic Analysis to Better Understand the Key Barriers to Medication Adherence

Background Nonadherence to P2Y12 inhibitor therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, there are a variety of factors - intentional and non-intentional - that contribute to P2Y12 inhibitor nonadherence and result in poor patient outcomes. Objective The primary aim of this study was to identify natural, lived experiences of individuals taking P2Y12 inhibitors in the real world, using a widely used social media platform to identify common barriers to medication adherence. Methods Using deidentified data extracted from Twitter (now known as X) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, user comments pertaining to generic and brand names of P2Y12 inhibitor use were extracted using the GetOldTweets API (Application Programming Interface) with Python. Non-English tweets, duplicates, posts from automated bots, and those from users with clinical titles were excluded. The remaining posts were then manually reviewed based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) discussed treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors, (2) reflected personal experiences with P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g., patient or caregiver), and (3) provided sufficient context for qualitative analysis. A total of 366 eligible posts were analyzed using conventional content analysis and grouped into five key themes, which were further categorized into positive, negative, or neutral sentiments. Results Five representative themes emerged from the data, including adverse drug reactions (137 or 37%), affordability (93 or 25%), inconvenience of taking the medication (77 or 21%), patient-perceived response to treatment (42 or 12%), and provider trust and communication (17 or 5%). Most posts (205 or 56%) expressed negative sentiments (e.g., anger, frustration, sadness, fear) about taking P2Y12 inhibitors, while 26 (7%) shared positive sentiments (e.g., joy, gratitude, happiness, excitement). The remaining 135 (37%) were classified as neutral. Conclusions This study, using natural, lived experiences of users with P2Y12 inhibitors, highlights the complex factors that may contribute to nonadherence to this medication. By better understanding patient attitudes and beliefs regarding this class of medication, as expressed in user comments, barriers to adherence can be identified and form the basis for future studies aimed at developing meaningful interventions to ensure consistent P2Y12 inhibitor use among post-PCI patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.85924
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medication Beliefs Regarding P2Y12 Inhibitors: An Exploratory Thematic and Semantic Analysis to Better Understand the Key Barriers to Medication Adherence

Kyle Tejuco, Franklin Heng, Yong Kyung Choi, Manoj Kesarwani et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Medication Adherence and Compliance
1.52
article

Medication Beliefs Regarding P2Y12 Inhibitors: An Exploratory Thematic and Semantic Analysis to Better Understand the Key Barriers to Medication Adherence

Kyle Tejuco, Franklin Heng, Yong Kyung Choi, Manoj Kesarwani, Jin Sol Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Nonadherence to P2Y12 inhibitor therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, there are a variety of factors - intentional and non-intentional - that contribute to P2Y12 inhibitor nonadherence and result in poor patient outcomes. Objective The primary aim of this study was to identify natural, lived experiences of individuals taking P2Y12 inhibitors in the real world, using a widely used social media platform to identify common barriers to medication adherence. Methods Using deidentified data extracted from Twitter (now known as X) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, user comments pertaining to generic and brand names of P2Y12 inhibitor use were extracted using the GetOldTweets API (Application Programming Interface) with Python. Non-English tweets, duplicates, posts from automated bots, and those from users with clinical titles were excluded. The remaining posts were then manually reviewed based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) discussed treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors, (2) reflected personal experiences with P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g., patient or caregiver), and (3) provided sufficient context for qualitative analysis. A total of 366 eligible posts were analyzed using conventional content analysis and grouped into five key themes, which were further categorized into positive, negative, or neutral sentiments. Results Five representative themes emerged from the data, including adverse drug reactions (137 or 37%), affordability (93 or 25%), inconvenience of taking the medication (77 or 21%), patient-perceived response to treatment (42 or 12%), and provider trust and communication (17 or 5%). Most posts (205 or 56%) expressed negative sentiments (e.g., anger, frustration, sadness, fear) about taking P2Y12 inhibitors, while 26 (7%) shared positive sentiments (e.g., joy, gratitude, happiness, excitement). The remaining 135 (37%) were classified as neutral. Conclusions This study, using natural, lived experiences of users with P2Y12 inhibitors, highlights the complex factors that may contribute to nonadherence to this medication. By better understanding patient attitudes and beliefs regarding this class of medication, as expressed in user comments, barriers to adherence can be identified and form the basis for future studies aimed at developing meaningful interventions to ensure consistent P2Y12 inhibitor use among post-PCI patients.

CureusVol. 17(6)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.