Exploring the Perspectives of Health and Social Care Workers on the Influence of CQC-Regulated Services on Providers in the Health and Social Care Sector

Within the United Kingdom, particularly England, this work is an exploration of the health and social care employees’ perspective on the impacts of Care Quality Commission (CQC)-regulated services. The CQC plays a paramount role in sustaining, maintaining, and improving the quality of service delivery, being the primary regulator. Nonetheless, these roles have practical implications for health and social care frontliners. The CQC regulations influence the quality of service delivery in England. Based on the foregoing, the present study examines the impact assessment of CQC-regulated activities through the health and social care personnel perspective, covering areas like roles, practices, outcomes, and quality of care. This study uses a quantitative research method as well as a survey method to gather data from various healthcare providers by administering a well-structured Google Form (survey questionnaire) to about 250 persons. About 143 participating individuals within the health and social care sector responded. Data was analysed through the lens of descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. Findings reveal a structural disconnect between the approach to inspection and the health and social care service realities. It is, however, compounded by genuine concerns about accuracy, fairness, frontline engagement, and lack of flexibility in implementation—with 64.3% suggesting that CQC is a reflection of true standards; other results, as also shown in RQ2, indicate that CQC ratings are also influenced by internal strategies and external perceptions. 58.1% and 49% viewed CQC as impactful; meanwhile, 12.6% and 11.9% reflect the gaps in capturing staff needs and the daily operational struggles. Critical gaps in regulatory methodologies and potentially biased approaches are voiced out in the analysis and pinpointed by 10.5% and 12.6% of respondents, respectively. The findings further highlighted the challenges and the positive aspects of CQC regulation. Moreover, the research provides substantial input to the ongoing discussion in both academic and health settings regarding regulation in care settings. It also offers service enhancement and insight to regulatory bodies, policymakers, and health providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i61045
Primary Topic
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Perspectives of Health and Social Care Workers on the Influence of CQC-Regulated Services on Providers in the Health and Social Care Sector

Chijioke Paul Igwe, Fimbaya Chua Ephraim, Ejikeme Peter Igwe
Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
article

Exploring the Perspectives of Health and Social Care Workers on the Influence of CQC-Regulated Services on Providers in the Health and Social Care Sector

Chijioke Paul Igwe, Fimbaya Chua Ephraim, Ejikeme Peter Igwe
article en

Abstract

Within the United Kingdom, particularly England, this work is an exploration of the health and social care employees’ perspective on the impacts of Care Quality Commission (CQC)-regulated services. The CQC plays a paramount role in sustaining, maintaining, and improving the quality of service delivery, being the primary regulator. Nonetheless, these roles have practical implications for health and social care frontliners. The CQC regulations influence the quality of service delivery in England. Based on the foregoing, the present study examines the impact assessment of CQC-regulated activities through the health and social care personnel perspective, covering areas like roles, practices, outcomes, and quality of care. This study uses a quantitative research method as well as a survey method to gather data from various healthcare providers by administering a well-structured Google Form (survey questionnaire) to about 250 persons. About 143 participating individuals within the health and social care sector responded. Data was analysed through the lens of descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. Findings reveal a structural disconnect between the approach to inspection and the health and social care service realities. It is, however, compounded by genuine concerns about accuracy, fairness, frontline engagement, and lack of flexibility in implementation—with 64.3% suggesting that CQC is a reflection of true standards; other results, as also shown in RQ2, indicate that CQC ratings are also influenced by internal strategies and external perceptions. 58.1% and 49% viewed CQC as impactful; meanwhile, 12.6% and 11.9% reflect the gaps in capturing staff needs and the daily operational struggles. Critical gaps in regulatory methodologies and potentially biased approaches are voiced out in the analysis and pinpointed by 10.5% and 12.6% of respondents, respectively. The findings further highlighted the challenges and the positive aspects of CQC regulation. Moreover, the research provides substantial input to the ongoing discussion in both academic and health settings regarding regulation in care settings. It also offers service enhancement and insight to regulatory bodies, policymakers, and health providers.

Asian Journal of Advanced Research and ReportsVol. 19(6)
University of Ulster (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), University of Westminster (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.