Sustainability trade-offs across modeled floating solar waterscapes of the Northeastern United States
<h2>Summary</h2> Expansion of floating photovoltaic (FPV) solar systems provides a low-conflict renewable energy option to help mitigate climate change while sparing land, but potential sustainability trade-offs remain unquantified. We compare the technical potential of maximum FPV deployment to address the climate crisis with FPV-buildout scenarios that prioritize biodiversity and social values across waterscapes. FPV deployment on all technically suitable waterbodies (3.5% of available sites) in the Northeastern US could generate nearly a quarter of the region's solar energy while offsetting all the land required for solar by 2050, but trade-offs, including maintenance of freshwater biodiversity and recreational benefits, exist. Avoidance of socioenvironmental interactions yields FPV-electricity generation potential equal to a 5% increase in regional solar generation while sparing water for biodiversity and social values, though opportunities for co-location make this a conservative estimate. Our framework extends technical potential assessments to holistically inform FPV siting and support diverse Sustainable Development Goals.
Authors
- Elizabeth L. Kalies (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7749-6647)
- Adam Gallaher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1502-1416)
- Steven M. Grodsky (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0846-7230)
Institutions
- The Nature Conservancy (US)
- Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cell Reports Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-06-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100423
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.45
Funders
- David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University
- Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University