3-Majority and 2-Choices with Many Opinions

We present the first nearly-optimal bounds on the consensus time for the well-known synchronous consensus dynamics, specifically 3-Majority and 2-Choices, for an arbitrary number of opinions. In synchronous consensus dynamics, we consider an n-vertex complete graph with self-loops, where each vertex holds an opinion from {1,..., k}. At each discrete-time round, all vertices update their opinions simultaneously according to a given protocol. The goal is to reach a consensus, where all vertices support the same opinion. In 3-Majority, each vertex chooses three random neighbors with replacement and updates its opinion to match the majority, with ties broken randomly. In 2-Choices, each vertex chooses two random neighbors with replacement. If the selected vertices hold the same opinion, the vertex adopts that opinion. Otherwise, it retains its current opinion for that round.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3732772.3733511
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3-Majority and 2-Choices with Many Opinions

Takeharu Shiraga, Nobutaka Shimizu
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

3-Majority and 2-Choices with Many Opinions

Takeharu Shiraga, Nobutaka Shimizu
article en

Abstract

We present the first nearly-optimal bounds on the consensus time for the well-known synchronous consensus dynamics, specifically 3-Majority and 2-Choices, for an arbitrary number of opinions. In synchronous consensus dynamics, we consider an n-vertex complete graph with self-loops, where each vertex holds an opinion from {1,..., k}. At each discrete-time round, all vertices update their opinions simultaneously according to a given protocol. The goal is to reach a consensus, where all vertices support the same opinion. In 3-Majority, each vertex chooses three random neighbors with replacement and updates its opinion to match the majority, with ties broken randomly. In 2-Choices, each vertex chooses two random neighbors with replacement. If the selected vertices hold the same opinion, the vertex adopts that opinion. Otherwise, it retains its current opinion for that round.

Institute of Science Tokyo (JP), Chuo University (JP)
King's College London, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

3-Majority and 2-Choices with Many Opinions — Takeharu Shiraga, Nobutaka Shimizu · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS