Comparing neurosurgery training in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study of public and private institutions

Abstract Background Neurosurgical training in Pakistan differs between public and private institutions. This study aims to evaluate these differences, examining how the sector affects the quality and scope of medical education across the country. Methods A nationwide survey was conducted in Pakistan, covering 22 College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan (CPSP) accredited training programs. We used convenience sampling with a validated questionnaire and analyzed data using STATA 17. Results The response rate was 98% with a mean age of 30.4 ± 4.1 years. 30.6% females and 69.4% males were from public institutions, and 22.7% females and 77.3% males from private. Trainees in both sectors had limited exposure to advanced subspecialties, including endovascular (53.1% public and 22.7% private) and deep brain stimulation (26.5% public and 22.7% private). Both sectors lacked publications in indexed journals, with 71.4% in the public and 50% in the private sector having none. Public sector trainees reported more hands-on experience and longer working hours than private. In the public sector, there were more live surgery workshops (56.1% vs. 31.8% in private) and neurosurgical conferences (83.7% vs. 72.7% in private). However, cadaveric workshops were significantly lacking (15.3% vs. 9.1% in private). Access to simulation-based modalities, including cranial (16.3% vs. 50.0% in private) was limited. Educational activities were similar in both sectors, including tumor board meetings, journal clubs, and case-based sessions. Half of the programs had a regular trainees’ evaluation system (50.0% public and 55.5% private), with a smaller proportion offering a fellowship program in the public sector (43.9% public and 63.6% private). Conclusion The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive training programs with diverse teaching methods. These insights provide a groundwork for improving neurosurgical training across different sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery : the official publication of the Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons/Egyptian journal of neurosurgery
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-025-00426-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing neurosurgery training in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study of public and private institutions

Hammad Atif Irshad, M Imran Chaudry, Syed Ather Enam, Muhammad Abdul Basit et al.
1 citations
The Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery : the official publication of the Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons/Egyptian journal of neurosurgery
Global Health and Surgery
1.88
article

Comparing neurosurgery training in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study of public and private institutions

Hammad Atif Irshad, M Imran Chaudry, Syed Ather Enam, Muhammad Abdul Basit, Muhammad Shakir
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Neurosurgical training in Pakistan differs between public and private institutions. This study aims to evaluate these differences, examining how the sector affects the quality and scope of medical education across the country. Methods A nationwide survey was conducted in Pakistan, covering 22 College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan (CPSP) accredited training programs. We used convenience sampling with a validated questionnaire and analyzed data using STATA 17. Results The response rate was 98% with a mean age of 30.4 ± 4.1 years. 30.6% females and 69.4% males were from public institutions, and 22.7% females and 77.3% males from private. Trainees in both sectors had limited exposure to advanced subspecialties, including endovascular (53.1% public and 22.7% private) and deep brain stimulation (26.5% public and 22.7% private). Both sectors lacked publications in indexed journals, with 71.4% in the public and 50% in the private sector having none. Public sector trainees reported more hands-on experience and longer working hours than private. In the public sector, there were more live surgery workshops (56.1% vs. 31.8% in private) and neurosurgical conferences (83.7% vs. 72.7% in private). However, cadaveric workshops were significantly lacking (15.3% vs. 9.1% in private). Access to simulation-based modalities, including cranial (16.3% vs. 50.0% in private) was limited. Educational activities were similar in both sectors, including tumor board meetings, journal clubs, and case-based sessions. Half of the programs had a regular trainees’ evaluation system (50.0% public and 55.5% private), with a smaller proportion offering a fellowship program in the public sector (43.9% public and 63.6% private). Conclusion The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive training programs with diverse teaching methods. These insights provide a groundwork for improving neurosurgical training across different sectors.

The Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery : the official publication of the Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons/Egyptian journal of neurosurgeryVol. 40(1)
Aga Khan University (PK), Services Institute of Medical Sciences (PK), Aga Khan University Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Global Health and Surgery
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.