Incidence of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (INSIC) Trial: Study Protocol of a Combined Retrospective and Prospective, Multicenter, International, Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Epidemiological Observational Trial

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Sepsis and septic shock are the most severe forms of infection. Due to the intensive cross-talk of the coagulation and immune system, coagulopathies regularly occur in sepsis. The International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis refers to these coagulation abnormalities as sepsis-induced coagulopathies (SICs). The presence of SICs can be assessed using the SIC score. In parallel, a score for "sepsis-associated coagulopathy" (SAC) was introduced that, in contrast to the SIC score, allows coagulopathy to be classified according to its severity. In the past, multicenter, randomized controlled trials have repeatedly failed to prove the efficacy of specific therapeutic measures targeting SICs or SACs. This could potentially be explained by insufficient knowledge about the prevalence and incidence of SIC and the rate of spontaneous recovery. The Incidence of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (INSIC) trial is intended to address this problem. <b>Methods:</b> The aim of the INSIC trial is to measure the incidence and prevalence of SIC-in addition to the rate of spontaneous SIC recoveries-during the first days of sepsis treatment to provide a solid base of data for future interventional trials. We aim to include all patients with sepsis treated in any one of 150 participating intensive care units in 100 hospitals located in Austria, Luxembourg, and Germany to determine the prevalence of SIC (on day 1 of the study period as well as on three selected days in the fourth quarter of each year from 2019 to 2024). SIC incidence will be assessed over a 14-day period starting on 10 March 2025. Secondary endpoints are 28-day survival and the occurrence of severe thromboembolic events and bleeding. In addition, each of the aforementioned outcome parameters will be assessed for correlation with the severity classification of the SAC score. <b>Conclusions:</b> The INSIC trial is the first study to determine the prevalence as well as the incidence of SIC, to prospectively examine the course of SIC longitudinally over a 14-day period, and to determine the rate of spontaneous recoveries within 72 h under standard treatment in a large cohort of patients. This information will provide a sound basis for future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124222
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (INSIC) Trial: Study Protocol of a Combined Retrospective and Prospective, Multicenter, International, Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Epidemiological Observational Trial

Jonas Gregorius, Patrick Meybohm, Holger Bogatsch, Frank Bloos et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Incidence of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (INSIC) Trial: Study Protocol of a Combined Retrospective and Prospective, Multicenter, International, Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Epidemiological Observational Trial

Jonas Gregorius, Patrick Meybohm, Holger Bogatsch, Frank Bloos, Josef Briegel, Sandra Frank, Thorsten Brenner, David I. Radke, Maximilian Dietrich, Patrick Möhnle, Michael Bauer, Thomas Schmoch, Markus Weigand
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Sepsis and septic shock are the most severe forms of infection. Due to the intensive cross-talk of the coagulation and immune system, coagulopathies regularly occur in sepsis. The International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis refers to these coagulation abnormalities as sepsis-induced coagulopathies (SICs). The presence of SICs can be assessed using the SIC score. In parallel, a score for "sepsis-associated coagulopathy" (SAC) was introduced that, in contrast to the SIC score, allows coagulopathy to be classified according to its severity. In the past, multicenter, randomized controlled trials have repeatedly failed to prove the efficacy of specific therapeutic measures targeting SICs or SACs. This could potentially be explained by insufficient knowledge about the prevalence and incidence of SIC and the rate of spontaneous recovery. The Incidence of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (INSIC) trial is intended to address this problem. <b>Methods:</b> The aim of the INSIC trial is to measure the incidence and prevalence of SIC-in addition to the rate of spontaneous SIC recoveries-during the first days of sepsis treatment to provide a solid base of data for future interventional trials. We aim to include all patients with sepsis treated in any one of 150 participating intensive care units in 100 hospitals located in Austria, Luxembourg, and Germany to determine the prevalence of SIC (on day 1 of the study period as well as on three selected days in the fourth quarter of each year from 2019 to 2024). SIC incidence will be assessed over a 14-day period starting on 10 March 2025. Secondary endpoints are 28-day survival and the occurrence of severe thromboembolic events and bleeding. In addition, each of the aforementioned outcome parameters will be assessed for correlation with the severity classification of the SAC score. <b>Conclusions:</b> The INSIC trial is the first study to determine the prevalence as well as the incidence of SIC, to prospectively examine the course of SIC longitudinally over a 14-day period, and to determine the rate of spontaneous recoveries within 72 h under standard treatment in a large cohort of patients. This information will provide a sound basis for future studies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(12)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Hôpital Kirchberg (LU), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.