<i>JWST</i> PRIMER: strong evidence for the environmental quenching of low-mass galaxies out to <i>z</i>≃ 2

ABSTRACT We present the results of a study investigating the galaxy stellar-mass function (GSMF), size–mass relations, and morphological properties of star-forming and quiescent galaxies over the redshift range $0.25 &amp;lt; z &amp;lt; 2.25$, using the JWST PRIMER survey. The depth of the PRIMER near-IR imaging allows us to confirm the double Schechter function shape of the quiescent GSMF out to $z \simeq 2.0$, via a clear detection of the upturn at $\mathrm{log}_{10} (M_{\star }/\mathrm{M}_{\odot })\le 10$ thought to be induced by environmental quenching. Additionally, we confirm that quiescent galaxies can be split into separate populations at $\mathrm{log}_{10} (M_{\star }/\mathrm{M}_{\odot })\simeq 10$, based on their size–mass relations and morphologies. We find that low-mass quiescent galaxies have more disc-like morphologies (based on Sérsic index, Gini coefficient, and $M_{20}$ metrics) and follow a shallower size–mass relation than their high-mass counterparts. Indeed, the slope of the size–mass relation followed by low-mass quiescent galaxies is indistinguishable from that followed by star-forming galaxies, albeit with a lower normalization. Moreover, within the errors, the evolution in the median size of low-mass quiescent galaxies ($R_\mathrm{{e}} \propto (1+z)^{-0.22\pm 0.10})$ is indistinguishable from that followed by star-forming galaxies, and significantly less rapid than that displayed by high-mass quiescent galaxies ($R_\mathrm{{e}} \propto (1+z)^{-1.48\pm 0.16})$. Overall, our results are consistent with low- and high-mass quiescent galaxies following different quenching pathways. The evolution of low-mass quiescent galaxies is qualitatively consistent with the expectations of external/environmental quenching (e.g. ram-pressure stripping). In contrast, the evolution of high-mass quiescent galaxies is consistent with internal/mass quenching (e.g. active galactic nucleus feedback) followed by size growth driven by minor mergers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf971
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JWST PRIMER: strong evidence for the environmental quenching of low-mass galaxies out to z≃ 2

Adam C. Carnall, M. L. Hamadouche, James Aird, R Begley et al.
10 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
11.55
article

JWST PRIMER: strong evidence for the environmental quenching of low-mass galaxies out to z≃ 2

Adam C. Carnall, M. L. Hamadouche, James Aird, R Begley, Sally J. Cutler, T M Stanton, Norman A. Grogin, J. S. Dunlop, O. Almaini, Callum T. Donnan, Anton M. Koekemoer, D J McLeod, Fergus Cullen, Katherine E. Whitaker, R. J. McLure
article en
10 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present the results of a study investigating the galaxy stellar-mass function (GSMF), size–mass relations, and morphological properties of star-forming and quiescent galaxies over the redshift range $0.25 &amp;lt; z &amp;lt; 2.25$, using the JWST PRIMER survey. The depth of the PRIMER near-IR imaging allows us to confirm the double Schechter function shape of the quiescent GSMF out to $z \simeq 2.0$, via a clear detection of the upturn at $\mathrm{log}_{10} (M_{\star }/\mathrm{M}_{\odot })\le 10$ thought to be induced by environmental quenching. Additionally, we confirm that quiescent galaxies can be split into separate populations at $\mathrm{log}_{10} (M_{\star }/\mathrm{M}_{\odot })\simeq 10$, based on their size–mass relations and morphologies. We find that low-mass quiescent galaxies have more disc-like morphologies (based on Sérsic index, Gini coefficient, and $M_{20}$ metrics) and follow a shallower size–mass relation than their high-mass counterparts. Indeed, the slope of the size–mass relation followed by low-mass quiescent galaxies is indistinguishable from that followed by star-forming galaxies, albeit with a lower normalization. Moreover, within the errors, the evolution in the median size of low-mass quiescent galaxies ($R_\mathrm{{e}} \propto (1+z)^{-0.22\pm 0.10})$ is indistinguishable from that followed by star-forming galaxies, and significantly less rapid than that displayed by high-mass quiescent galaxies ($R_\mathrm{{e}} \propto (1+z)^{-1.48\pm 0.16})$. Overall, our results are consistent with low- and high-mass quiescent galaxies following different quenching pathways. The evolution of low-mass quiescent galaxies is qualitatively consistent with the expectations of external/environmental quenching (e.g. ram-pressure stripping). In contrast, the evolution of high-mass quiescent galaxies is consistent with internal/mass quenching (e.g. active galactic nucleus feedback) followed by size growth driven by minor mergers.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 541(1)
Space Telescope Science Institute (US), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Royal Observatory (GB), DAWN Center for Independent Living (US), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), University of Edinburgh (GB)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, UK Research and Innovation, Royal Society, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
11.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.