SIU-ICUD: Germline Genetic Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer: Utility and Clinical Implementation

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men globally and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Germline genetic evaluation is increasingly recognized as essential for men with high-risk features such as a strong family history or advanced disease. Methods: Comprehensive genetic risk assessment should integrate three components: family history (FH), rare pathogenic mutations (RPMs), and polygenic risk scores (PRS). RPMs in DNA repair genes (e.g., BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM) can inform screening, prognosis, and treatment strategies, particularly for metastatic or aggressive disease. PRS, derived from common genetic variants, provides a personalized and independent measure of prostate cancer risk and may guide decisions on screening intensity and timing. Results: Although PRS cannot yet differentiate between indolent and aggressive cancer, it has the potential to stratify men into low and high-risk categories more effectively than FH or RPMs alone. Knowledge of specific RPMs can influence treatment decisions in clinically advanced prostate cancer. Challenges in clinical implementation include limited provider awareness, underutilization of genetic counseling, and lack of diversity in genomic datasets, which can lead to misdiagnoses. Emerging technologies and digital tools are being developed to streamline genetic testing and counseling. Population-level strategies and tailored screening protocols based on genetic risk are under active investigation. Conclusions: While early evidence suggests high satisfaction with genetic testing among patients, further studies in diverse populations are needed. Integration of germline genetic information into prostate cancer management offers promising avenues for personalized screening, surveillance, and treatment, ultimately aiming to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6030045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SIU-ICUD: Germline Genetic Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer: Utility and Clinical Implementation

Liesel M. FitzGerald, Rosalind A. Eeles, James T. Kearns, Jianfeng Xu et al.
1 citations
Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
1.52
article

SIU-ICUD: Germline Genetic Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer: Utility and Clinical Implementation

Liesel M. FitzGerald, Rosalind A. Eeles, James T. Kearns, Jianfeng Xu, Stacy Loeb, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Huy Tran, Zhuqing Shi, Christian P. Pavlovich, Timothy Richard Rebbeck, Peter J. Hulick, Elena Castro, Jun Wei, Brian T. Helfand, Annabelle Ashworth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men globally and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Germline genetic evaluation is increasingly recognized as essential for men with high-risk features such as a strong family history or advanced disease. Methods: Comprehensive genetic risk assessment should integrate three components: family history (FH), rare pathogenic mutations (RPMs), and polygenic risk scores (PRS). RPMs in DNA repair genes (e.g., BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM) can inform screening, prognosis, and treatment strategies, particularly for metastatic or aggressive disease. PRS, derived from common genetic variants, provides a personalized and independent measure of prostate cancer risk and may guide decisions on screening intensity and timing. Results: Although PRS cannot yet differentiate between indolent and aggressive cancer, it has the potential to stratify men into low and high-risk categories more effectively than FH or RPMs alone. Knowledge of specific RPMs can influence treatment decisions in clinically advanced prostate cancer. Challenges in clinical implementation include limited provider awareness, underutilization of genetic counseling, and lack of diversity in genomic datasets, which can lead to misdiagnoses. Emerging technologies and digital tools are being developed to streamline genetic testing and counseling. Population-level strategies and tailored screening protocols based on genetic risk are under active investigation. Conclusions: While early evidence suggests high satisfaction with genetic testing among patients, further studies in diverse populations are needed. Integration of germline genetic information into prostate cancer management offers promising avenues for personalized screening, surveillance, and treatment, ultimately aiming to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Société Internationale d’Urologie JournalVol. 6(3)
University of Tasmania (AU), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), Harvard University (US), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), New York University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Prostate Cancer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.