Impact of protein on sensory attributes and liking of plant-based Milk alternatives

Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) have a limited nutrient profile compared to dairy milk, primarily due to their lower protein content. Although fortification with protein can enhance their nutritional value, this addition changes the product's texture and introduces undesirable off-flavours, such as beaniness or chalkiness, which can hinder consumer acceptance. The primary aim of the study was to examine the impact of protein concentration (1 and 4 %) and source (soy, oat, pea) on the perception of sensory attributes and overall liking of PBMAs. Ninety-four consumers evaluated 6 lab-prepared PBMAs for liking using a 9-point hedonic scale. Optimal perception of attributes was assessed using just-about-right scales, and attribute analysis using check-all-that-apply. Penalty analysis was applied to evaluate liking drops, and logistic regression examined the relationship between protein source/quantity and sensory attribute perception. Low protein samples had higher overall liking than high protein ( p < 0.001) with 50.7 % of the variance attributed to textural factors such as thickness and grittiness. Furthermore, on comparison with soy-based samples, beaniness was selected 2.34 times more in pea-based samples and chalkiness was selected 4.92 more times in oat-based samples. Protein concentration impacted perception of thickness, with high-protein samples being selected as thick 22.9 times more often than low protein samples. Overall, adding protein to PBMAs improves their nutrient profile, matching its protein content with dairy milk, but it also introduces textural challenges that reduces consumer acceptance. • Consumers assessed the flavour of lab-prepared plant-based milk alternatives varying in protein content and type. • Low protein samples were liked more than high protein samples. • Adding protein increases thickness and grittiness but also creaminess in plant-based milk. • Texture and sweetness are major factors affecting liking of plant-based milk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105617
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of protein on sensory attributes and liking of plant-based Milk alternatives

Andrew Costanzo, Djin Gie Liem, Russell Keast, Yada Nolvachai et al.
6 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Meat and Animal Product Quality
7.16
article

Impact of protein on sensory attributes and liking of plant-based Milk alternatives

Andrew Costanzo, Djin Gie Liem, Russell Keast, Yada Nolvachai, Bharti Sharma
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) have a limited nutrient profile compared to dairy milk, primarily due to their lower protein content. Although fortification with protein can enhance their nutritional value, this addition changes the product's texture and introduces undesirable off-flavours, such as beaniness or chalkiness, which can hinder consumer acceptance. The primary aim of the study was to examine the impact of protein concentration (1 and 4 %) and source (soy, oat, pea) on the perception of sensory attributes and overall liking of PBMAs. Ninety-four consumers evaluated 6 lab-prepared PBMAs for liking using a 9-point hedonic scale. Optimal perception of attributes was assessed using just-about-right scales, and attribute analysis using check-all-that-apply. Penalty analysis was applied to evaluate liking drops, and logistic regression examined the relationship between protein source/quantity and sensory attribute perception. Low protein samples had higher overall liking than high protein ( p < 0.001) with 50.7 % of the variance attributed to textural factors such as thickness and grittiness. Furthermore, on comparison with soy-based samples, beaniness was selected 2.34 times more in pea-based samples and chalkiness was selected 4.92 more times in oat-based samples. Protein concentration impacted perception of thickness, with high-protein samples being selected as thick 22.9 times more often than low protein samples. Overall, adding protein to PBMAs improves their nutrient profile, matching its protein content with dairy milk, but it also introduces textural challenges that reduces consumer acceptance. • Consumers assessed the flavour of lab-prepared plant-based milk alternatives varying in protein content and type. • Low protein samples were liked more than high protein samples. • Adding protein increases thickness and grittiness but also creaminess in plant-based milk. • Texture and sweetness are major factors affecting liking of plant-based milk.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 133
Deakin University (AU), Separation Systems (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.