Advanced 3D biomaterials and bioprinting strategies for in vitro modeling of neurodegenerative diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remain a major global health challenge due to their progressive nature and lack of curative treatments. Traditional animal models and 2D cell cultures fail to recapitulate the complex microenvironment and human-specific pathophysiology of these disorders. In response, advanced 3D in vitro models incorporating functional biomaterials have emerged as promising platforms for replicating disease mechanisms, enabling personalized medicine, and accelerating therapeutic discovery. This review highlights recent progress in the design and application of bioinspired and engineered biomaterials, including natural, synthetic, and hybrid scaffolds, which mimic the extracellular matrix and guide neural cell behavior. Hydrogels, stimuli-responsive polymers, and conductive nanocomposites are increasingly used in scaffold fabrication and 3D bioprinting. Integration with patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and microfluidic platforms enables the creation of physiologically relevant models that replicate key pathological features. We discuss the importance of quantitative materials characterization including porosity, stiffness, swelling, degradation, and wettability in ensuring scaffold reproducibility and translational relevance. Despite challenges like vascularization and culture stability, innovations are addressing these barriers. Advanced biomaterials enable precise cell placement and structure. High-precision bioprinting and microfluidics support perfusable vessels. AI-driven data integration enhances scalability, optimizes conditions, analyzes large datasets, and improves reproducibility by minimizing batch variability in 3D in vitro models. Recent advances in bioelectric and electrochemical biomaterials including piezoelectric PLLA membranes, wirelessly self-powered Zn/Ag 2 O scaffolds, 3D-printed carbon nanoelectrodes, and conductive POSS-PCL/graphene nanocomposites offer promising multifunctional platforms for 3D neurodegenerative disease models. • 3D in vitro models mimic human physiology for neurodegenerative disease studies. • 3D models replicate key disease features, aiding accurate mechanistic research. • iPSCs enables personalized modeling and precision medicine in 3D platforms. • Bioprinting, microfluidics, and AI enhance the performance of 3D models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Technology
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmt.2025.100089
Citations
7
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced 3D biomaterials and bioprinting strategies for in vitro modeling of neurodegenerative diseases

Karthikeyan Elumalai, J. Nandhini, D. Kannan, Meenaloshini Gopalakrishnan et al.
7 citations
Biomedical Technology
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
4.72
article

Advanced 3D biomaterials and bioprinting strategies for in vitro modeling of neurodegenerative diseases

Karthikeyan Elumalai, J. Nandhini, D. Kannan, Meenaloshini Gopalakrishnan, Karthik K Karunakar, Mahalakshmi Devaraji, Sujaritha Jayaraj
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remain a major global health challenge due to their progressive nature and lack of curative treatments. Traditional animal models and 2D cell cultures fail to recapitulate the complex microenvironment and human-specific pathophysiology of these disorders. In response, advanced 3D in vitro models incorporating functional biomaterials have emerged as promising platforms for replicating disease mechanisms, enabling personalized medicine, and accelerating therapeutic discovery. This review highlights recent progress in the design and application of bioinspired and engineered biomaterials, including natural, synthetic, and hybrid scaffolds, which mimic the extracellular matrix and guide neural cell behavior. Hydrogels, stimuli-responsive polymers, and conductive nanocomposites are increasingly used in scaffold fabrication and 3D bioprinting. Integration with patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and microfluidic platforms enables the creation of physiologically relevant models that replicate key pathological features. We discuss the importance of quantitative materials characterization including porosity, stiffness, swelling, degradation, and wettability in ensuring scaffold reproducibility and translational relevance. Despite challenges like vascularization and culture stability, innovations are addressing these barriers. Advanced biomaterials enable precise cell placement and structure. High-precision bioprinting and microfluidics support perfusable vessels. AI-driven data integration enhances scalability, optimizes conditions, analyzes large datasets, and improves reproducibility by minimizing batch variability in 3D in vitro models. Recent advances in bioelectric and electrochemical biomaterials including piezoelectric PLLA membranes, wirelessly self-powered Zn/Ag 2 O scaffolds, 3D-printed carbon nanoelectrodes, and conductive POSS-PCL/graphene nanocomposites offer promising multifunctional platforms for 3D neurodegenerative disease models. • 3D in vitro models mimic human physiology for neurodegenerative disease studies. • 3D models replicate key disease features, aiding accurate mechanistic research. • iPSCs enables personalized modeling and precision medicine in 3D platforms. • Bioprinting, microfluidics, and AI enhance the performance of 3D models.

Biomedical TechnologyVol. 11
Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
4.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.