Superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation vs. pressure-controlled ventilation in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: A randomised controlled trial

Ventilation management during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is challenging because of shared airway use and the risks of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia. This study compared the safety and efficacy of superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) using a supraglottic airway (SGA) under general anaesthesia. Patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA were randomly assigned to receive either SHFJV or PCV. The primary outcomes was perioperative changes in oxygenation index (OI) . Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hypoxaemia and hypercapnia, perioperative changes pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ), haemodynamic stability, intraoperative and postoperative adverse events (AEs), and SGA ventilation quality. All 88 patients (28.4% female; median age, 62 years) were analysed. Overall, 44 participants were randomised to SHFJV, and 44 participants were randomised to PCV. Post-hoc analysis showed that the SHFJV group had significantly greater improvement in OI at the end of surgery (mean difference(MD)=78.52, 95% confidence interval(CI), 30.35 to 126.68), P = 0.039) and a significant decrease in PaCO 2 after 19 minutes (MD= -8.23, 95% CI=-12.68 to -3.77, P =0.001). Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were similar between the groups, and no significant differences were observed in intraoperative hypoxaemia or hypercapnia. The SHFJV group had fewer cases of poor SGA ventilation quality (4.5%) than the PCV group (20%), demonstrating superior SGA ventilation quality ( P =0.024). SHFJV significantly improved OI compared with PCV while maintaining comparable safety profiles during EBUS-TBNA. These findings underscore the SHFJV as a promising ventilation strategy, particularly for patients requiring improved oxygenation during complex airway interventions. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Registration number: ChiCTR2300071799; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=197551

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101571
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation vs. pressure-controlled ventilation in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: A randomised controlled trial

Manman Liu, Jie Liu, Juanlan Liu, Wanxia Xiong et al.
Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation vs. pressure-controlled ventilation in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: A randomised controlled trial

Manman Liu, Jie Liu, Juanlan Liu, Wanxia Xiong, Zhen Yang, Y.-T. Lin, Biling Wu, Chao Liang
article en

Abstract

Ventilation management during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is challenging because of shared airway use and the risks of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia. This study compared the safety and efficacy of superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) using a supraglottic airway (SGA) under general anaesthesia. Patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA were randomly assigned to receive either SHFJV or PCV. The primary outcomes was perioperative changes in oxygenation index (OI) . Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hypoxaemia and hypercapnia, perioperative changes pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ), haemodynamic stability, intraoperative and postoperative adverse events (AEs), and SGA ventilation quality. All 88 patients (28.4% female; median age, 62 years) were analysed. Overall, 44 participants were randomised to SHFJV, and 44 participants were randomised to PCV. Post-hoc analysis showed that the SHFJV group had significantly greater improvement in OI at the end of surgery (mean difference(MD)=78.52, 95% confidence interval(CI), 30.35 to 126.68), P = 0.039) and a significant decrease in PaCO 2 after 19 minutes (MD= -8.23, 95% CI=-12.68 to -3.77, P =0.001). Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were similar between the groups, and no significant differences were observed in intraoperative hypoxaemia or hypercapnia. The SHFJV group had fewer cases of poor SGA ventilation quality (4.5%) than the PCV group (20%), demonstrating superior SGA ventilation quality ( P =0.024). SHFJV significantly improved OI compared with PCV while maintaining comparable safety profiles during EBUS-TBNA. These findings underscore the SHFJV as a promising ventilation strategy, particularly for patients requiring improved oxygenation during complex airway interventions. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Registration number: ChiCTR2300071799; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=197551

Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical CareVol. 63
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.