Fifth Centile Versus 50th Centile Mean Blood Pressure Targets in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Targeting a lower MBP (5th vs. 50th centile) in septic shock showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality. This suggests a lower BP target may be safe, reducing vasoactive drug use and related side effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006718
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fifth Centile Versus 50th Centile Mean Blood Pressure Targets in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Amita Kaul, Jayant Khandare, Ganesh Shiwarkar, Rajesh Nare et al.
5 citations
Critical Care Medicine
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
10.03
article

Fifth Centile Versus 50th Centile Mean Blood Pressure Targets in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Amita Kaul, Jayant Khandare, Ganesh Shiwarkar, Rajesh Nare, Sachin S Shah
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Targeting a lower MBP (5th vs. 50th centile) in septic shock showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality. This suggests a lower BP target may be safe, reducing vasoactive drug use and related side effects.

Critical Care MedicineVol. 53(8)
Mother Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
10.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.