Wave impacts on vertical cliffs: Insights from laboratory experiments and field observations

Many engineered and natural coastal structures suffer frequent damage from wave impacts. Motivated by field observations of wave impacts on coastal cliffs, we undertake controlled physical experiments with synchronised measurements of wave properties and their impacts on a vertical structure representing a cliff. Laboratory experiments using focused wave groups show that, in the investigated scenarios, large impacts occur within a relatively narrow phase range (-30° to 35°), covering ∼ 20% of the full phase range. Our irregular wave experiments indicate that ∼ 30% of waves break onto or near the cliff face, although not all these breaking waves result in large impacts. Irregular wave tests can produce large impacts due to amplitude modulation. In contrast, lacking this modulation, regular wave tests did not generate similarly large impacts. Reanalysis of field data using the same methodology confirms that intermediate values of wave heights at a given water depth (and intermediate values of water depths at a given wave height) produce the most breaking wave impacts and the highest ground motions. Additionally, we analyse the average shapes of large vibrations and the waves generating the associated impacts in both laboratory and field settings. The findings show that, on average, the offshore wave profiles are nearly identical for large impacts. However, the resulting ground motions still exhibit substantial variability in magnitude. These findings underscore the complexity of wave impacts on coastal cliffs and suggest that sea-level rise can shift impact regimes, potentially either exacerbating or mitigating subsequent coastal erosion. • Field and laboratory data exhibit significant variability in wave impact loads. • Water depth and wave height control impact regimes, affecting impact magnitudes. • At a given depth and wave height, phase sensitivity causes variation in impacts. • Regular waves show fewer large impacts due to enhanced reflection and no modulation. • Similar offshore average wave profiles cause large impacts with varying magnitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Engineering
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104794
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wave impacts on vertical cliffs: Insights from laboratory experiments and field observations

Mark Edward Dickson, Yaxiong Shen, Adam P. Young, Catriona F. Thompson et al.
2 citations
Coastal Engineering
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
3.34
article

Wave impacts on vertical cliffs: Insights from laboratory experiments and field observations

Mark Edward Dickson, Yaxiong Shen, Adam P. Young, Catriona F. Thompson, Colin Whittaker, Alison C. Raby
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Many engineered and natural coastal structures suffer frequent damage from wave impacts. Motivated by field observations of wave impacts on coastal cliffs, we undertake controlled physical experiments with synchronised measurements of wave properties and their impacts on a vertical structure representing a cliff. Laboratory experiments using focused wave groups show that, in the investigated scenarios, large impacts occur within a relatively narrow phase range (-30° to 35°), covering ∼ 20% of the full phase range. Our irregular wave experiments indicate that ∼ 30% of waves break onto or near the cliff face, although not all these breaking waves result in large impacts. Irregular wave tests can produce large impacts due to amplitude modulation. In contrast, lacking this modulation, regular wave tests did not generate similarly large impacts. Reanalysis of field data using the same methodology confirms that intermediate values of wave heights at a given water depth (and intermediate values of water depths at a given wave height) produce the most breaking wave impacts and the highest ground motions. Additionally, we analyse the average shapes of large vibrations and the waves generating the associated impacts in both laboratory and field settings. The findings show that, on average, the offshore wave profiles are nearly identical for large impacts. However, the resulting ground motions still exhibit substantial variability in magnitude. These findings underscore the complexity of wave impacts on coastal cliffs and suggest that sea-level rise can shift impact regimes, potentially either exacerbating or mitigating subsequent coastal erosion. • Field and laboratory data exhibit significant variability in wave impact loads. • Water depth and wave height control impact regimes, affecting impact magnitudes. • At a given depth and wave height, phase sensitivity causes variation in impacts. • Regular waves show fewer large impacts due to enhanced reflection and no modulation. • Similar offshore average wave profiles cause large impacts with varying magnitudes.

Coastal EngineeringVol. 201
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of Auckland (NZ), University of California San Diego (US), University of Plymouth (GB)
University of Auckland
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.