Deep learning in poultry farming: comparative analysis of Yolov8, Yolov9, Yolov10, and Yolov11 for dead chickens detection

Automated detection of dead chickens is essential for enhancing biosecurity, animal welfare, and operational efficiency in poultry farms. This study evaluates the performance of YOLOv8n, YOLOv9c, YOLOv10n, and YOLOv11n for detecting dead chickens in cage-free poultry farms. A synthetic dataset of 3413 images was created by compositing manually annotated images of dead and healthy chickens into realistic stall backgrounds to simulate real farm conditions. The models were assessed using standard object detection metrics (precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP) at IoU thresholds of 0.5 and 0.5-0.95) alongside computational efficiency indicators including inference speed, frames per second (FPS), model size, and training time. YOLOv9c achieved the highest detection accuracy (mAP@50 = 0.983, mAP@50-95 = 0.93), making it the most reliable for minimising false positives and missed detections. YOLOv11n delivered the fastest inference speed (2.8 ms/frame, ∼357 FPS), making it more suitable for real-time applications. These results underscore the importance of selecting a YOLO model based on farm-specific operational constraints. YOLOv9c is recommended for accuracy-critical tasks, YOLOv11n for real-time monitoring, and YOLOv8n or YOLOv10n for resource-limited deployments. Comparative analysis with earlier YOLO models (YOLOv3-YOLOv7) shows that newer versions improve both detection reliability and processing speed. This work contributes a performance benchmark to guide AI-based poultry monitoring and highlights future directions, including real-world deployment and validation under live farm conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105440
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Livestock and Poultry Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning in poultry farming: comparative analysis of Yolov8, Yolov9, Yolov10, and Yolov11 for dead chickens detection

Roman Bumbálek, Radim Stehlík, Radim Kuneš, Petr Bartoš et al.
13 citations
Poultry Science
Livestock and Poultry Management
15.51
article

Deep learning in poultry farming: comparative analysis of Yolov8, Yolov9, Yolov10, and Yolov11 for dead chickens detection

Roman Bumbálek, Radim Stehlík, Radim Kuneš, Petr Bartoš, Tomáš Zoubek, Hsien-I Lin, Jean de Dieu Marcel Ufitikirezi, Sandra Nicole Umurungi
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Automated detection of dead chickens is essential for enhancing biosecurity, animal welfare, and operational efficiency in poultry farms. This study evaluates the performance of YOLOv8n, YOLOv9c, YOLOv10n, and YOLOv11n for detecting dead chickens in cage-free poultry farms. A synthetic dataset of 3413 images was created by compositing manually annotated images of dead and healthy chickens into realistic stall backgrounds to simulate real farm conditions. The models were assessed using standard object detection metrics (precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP) at IoU thresholds of 0.5 and 0.5-0.95) alongside computational efficiency indicators including inference speed, frames per second (FPS), model size, and training time. YOLOv9c achieved the highest detection accuracy (mAP@50 = 0.983, mAP@50-95 = 0.93), making it the most reliable for minimising false positives and missed detections. YOLOv11n delivered the fastest inference speed (2.8 ms/frame, ∼357 FPS), making it more suitable for real-time applications. These results underscore the importance of selecting a YOLO model based on farm-specific operational constraints. YOLOv9c is recommended for accuracy-critical tasks, YOLOv11n for real-time monitoring, and YOLOv8n or YOLOv10n for resource-limited deployments. Comparative analysis with earlier YOLO models (YOLOv3-YOLOv7) shows that newer versions improve both detection reliability and processing speed. This work contributes a performance benchmark to guide AI-based poultry monitoring and highlights future directions, including real-world deployment and validation under live farm conditions.

Poultry ScienceVol. 104(9)
Sewanee: The University of the South (US), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ), Institute of Technology and Business (CZ)
Technology Agency of the Czech Republic
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Livestock and Poultry Management
15.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.