Optimizing the user-experience (UX) and −interface (UI) of a mHealth application to aid recovery from burn injury (BurnCORE) through a user-centered design approach

• Anticipatory guidance delivered via a mobile app can assist with early recovery after burn injury. • Use of user-centered design (UCD) can reduce costly changes to the app at later stages and maximize patient engagement. • UCD allowed patients to confirm important burn recovery domains, define valuable features, and elicit key user-interface features to optimize app engagement. Anticipatory guidance delivered via a mobile application (app) can support people with burn injury during the early recovery period. We sought to create a prototype app (Burn Connect and Recover – BurnCORE) to complement care provided at burn centers and serve as a transition to the burn survivorship community. We employed a user-centered design (UCD) approach in collaboration with a diverse group of burn care and technology stakeholders (e.g., patients, carers, clinicians, software engineers) to determine key content, functions, and interface preferences. UCD is an iterative design process where a multi-disciplinary team of application designers receive feedback from future end-users to improve understanding of user requirements, optimal features of user experience (UX), and user-app interface considerations (UI). We performed UCD according to its phases: Phase I--community advisory for foundational inspiration; Phase II--cognitive interviews with patients, their carers, and clinicians to determine key content and features; and Phase III--iterative co-design with stakeholders using low-fidelity prototypes. Participants in Phase I suggested that we focus on key gaps in knowledge of the timeline and domains of burn recovery, strategies to promote self-agency and motivation, eliminating barriers to using burn-specific resources, and select issues that aimed to improve UX. Stakeholders recommended several major application features: understanding the initial burn experience, visualizing recovery, and habituation of daily/weekly tasks. Examples of iterative stakeholder feedback include addition of recovery performance tracking, monitored community chat functions, and better ways to visualize recovery over time. UCD allowed us to confirm important burn recovery domains, define valuable features, and elicit from stakeholders key UX/UI features to optimize app engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Burns Open
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2025.100409
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the user-experience (UX) and −interface (UI) of a mHealth application to aid recovery from burn injury (BurnCORE) through a user-centered design approach

Caitlin Orton, Barclay T. Stewart, Gretchen J. Carrougher, Callie M Thompson et al.
1 links
Burns Open
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Optimizing the user-experience (UX) and −interface (UI) of a mHealth application to aid recovery from burn injury (BurnCORE) through a user-centered design approach

Caitlin Orton, Barclay T. Stewart, Gretchen J. Carrougher, Callie M Thompson, Gary Hsieh, Tam N. Pham, T. Kurien, Rebecca Estrada, Kyler Menge
article en

Abstract

• Anticipatory guidance delivered via a mobile app can assist with early recovery after burn injury. • Use of user-centered design (UCD) can reduce costly changes to the app at later stages and maximize patient engagement. • UCD allowed patients to confirm important burn recovery domains, define valuable features, and elicit key user-interface features to optimize app engagement. Anticipatory guidance delivered via a mobile application (app) can support people with burn injury during the early recovery period. We sought to create a prototype app (Burn Connect and Recover – BurnCORE) to complement care provided at burn centers and serve as a transition to the burn survivorship community. We employed a user-centered design (UCD) approach in collaboration with a diverse group of burn care and technology stakeholders (e.g., patients, carers, clinicians, software engineers) to determine key content, functions, and interface preferences. UCD is an iterative design process where a multi-disciplinary team of application designers receive feedback from future end-users to improve understanding of user requirements, optimal features of user experience (UX), and user-app interface considerations (UI). We performed UCD according to its phases: Phase I--community advisory for foundational inspiration; Phase II--cognitive interviews with patients, their carers, and clinicians to determine key content and features; and Phase III--iterative co-design with stakeholders using low-fidelity prototypes. Participants in Phase I suggested that we focus on key gaps in knowledge of the timeline and domains of burn recovery, strategies to promote self-agency and motivation, eliminating barriers to using burn-specific resources, and select issues that aimed to improve UX. Stakeholders recommended several major application features: understanding the initial burn experience, visualizing recovery, and habituation of daily/weekly tasks. Examples of iterative stakeholder feedback include addition of recovery performance tracking, monitored community chat functions, and better ways to visualize recovery over time. UCD allowed us to confirm important burn recovery domains, define valuable features, and elicit from stakeholders key UX/UI features to optimize app engagement.

Burns OpenVol. 11
University of Washington (US), University of Utah (US), Community Frameworks (US), User Interface Design (Germany) (DE)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.