Evaluation of the development of the offence of bribery as a corporate crime in the United Kingdom

This article evaluates whether the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 effectively resolves the long-standing barriers to prosecuting bribery as a corporate offence under United Kingdom law. It situates the Act within the international and domestic development of anti-bribery frameworks, in particular the Bribery Act 2010, and analyses the evolution of the identification principle, a doctrine that has historically restricted corporate liability by requiring prosecutors to identify a company's “directing mind and will.” The article argues that although the Act broadens the definition of senior management, practical enforcement challenges persist, with small and medium sized enterprises affected disproportionately compared to large corporations. Specifically, it claims that in relation to the offence of bribery as a corporate crime, the earlier enacted Bribery Act 2010 is sufficient to assist the prosecution with its “failure to prevent” bribery provision. This article concludes, that strengthening institutional capacity within the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) may prove more effective in improving the enforcement outcomes in relation to the offence of bribery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103250
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the development of the offence of bribery as a corporate crime in the United Kingdom

Elina Konstantinidou
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Evaluation of the development of the offence of bribery as a corporate crime in the United Kingdom

Elina Konstantinidou
article en

Abstract

This article evaluates whether the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 effectively resolves the long-standing barriers to prosecuting bribery as a corporate offence under United Kingdom law. It situates the Act within the international and domestic development of anti-bribery frameworks, in particular the Bribery Act 2010, and analyses the evolution of the identification principle, a doctrine that has historically restricted corporate liability by requiring prosecutors to identify a company's “directing mind and will.” The article argues that although the Act broadens the definition of senior management, practical enforcement challenges persist, with small and medium sized enterprises affected disproportionately compared to large corporations. Specifically, it claims that in relation to the offence of bribery as a corporate crime, the earlier enacted Bribery Act 2010 is sufficient to assist the prosecution with its “failure to prevent” bribery provision. This article concludes, that strengthening institutional capacity within the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) may prove more effective in improving the enforcement outcomes in relation to the offence of bribery.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 14
Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the development of the offence of bribery as a corporate crime in the United Kingdom — Elina Konstantinidou · Social Sciences & Humanities Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS