Machine learning on multiple topological materials datasets

A dataset of 35,608 materials with their topological properties is constructed by combining the density functional theory (DFT) results of Materiae and the Topological Materials Database. Thanks to this, machine-learning approaches are developed to categorize materials into five distinct topological types, with the XGBoost model achieving an impressive 85.2% classification accuracy. By conducting generalization tests on different sub-datasets, differences are identified between the original datasets in terms of topological types, chemical elements, unknown magnetic compounds, and feature space coverage. Their impact on model performance is analyzed. Turning to the simpler binary classification between trivial insulators and nontrivial topological materials, three different approaches are also tested. Key characteristics influencing material topology are identified, with the maximum packing efficiency and the fraction of p valence electrons being highlighted as critical features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Computational Materials
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01687-2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning on multiple topological materials datasets

Pierre-Paul De Breuck, Hongming Weng, Matteo Giantomassi, Gian‐Marco Rignanese et al.
npj Computational Materials
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Machine learning on multiple topological materials datasets

Pierre-Paul De Breuck, Hongming Weng, Matteo Giantomassi, Gian‐Marco Rignanese, Yuqing He
article en

Abstract

A dataset of 35,608 materials with their topological properties is constructed by combining the density functional theory (DFT) results of Materiae and the Topological Materials Database. Thanks to this, machine-learning approaches are developed to categorize materials into five distinct topological types, with the XGBoost model achieving an impressive 85.2% classification accuracy. By conducting generalization tests on different sub-datasets, differences are identified between the original datasets in terms of topological types, chemical elements, unknown magnetic compounds, and feature space coverage. Their impact on model performance is analyzed. Turning to the simpler binary classification between trivial insulators and nontrivial topological materials, three different approaches are also tested. Key characteristics influencing material topology are identified, with the maximum packing efficiency and the fraction of p valence electrons being highlighted as critical features.

npj Computational MaterialsVol. 11(1)
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Walloon Excellence in Lifesciences and Biotechnology (BE), Institute of Physics (CN), National Laboratory for Superconductivity (CN), UCLouvain (BE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, China Scholarship Council, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.