Uncovering ethical biases in publicly available fetal ultrasound datasets

We explore biases present in publicly available fetal ultrasound (US) imaging datasets, currently at the disposal of researchers to train deep learning (DL) algorithms for prenatal diagnostics. As DL increasingly permeates the field of medical imaging, the urgency to critically evaluate the fairness of benchmark public datasets used to train them grows. Our thorough investigation reveals a multifaceted bias problem, encompassing issues such as lack of demographic representativeness, limited diversity in clinical conditions depicted, and variability in US technology used across datasets. We argue that these biases may significantly influence DL model performance, which may lead to inequities in healthcare outcomes. To address these challenges, we recommend a multilayered approach. This includes promoting practices that ensure data inclusivity, such as diversifying data sources and populations, and refining model strategies to better account for population variances. These steps will enhance the trustworthiness of DL algorithms in fetal US analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01739-3
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering ethical biases in publicly available fetal ultrasound datasets

Emanuele Frontoni, Simona Tiribelli, Benedetta Giovanola, Sara Moccia et al.
5 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
17.47
article

Uncovering ethical biases in publicly available fetal ultrasound datasets

Emanuele Frontoni, Simona Tiribelli, Benedetta Giovanola, Sara Moccia, Mariachiara Di Cosmo, Maria Chiara Fiorentino
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We explore biases present in publicly available fetal ultrasound (US) imaging datasets, currently at the disposal of researchers to train deep learning (DL) algorithms for prenatal diagnostics. As DL increasingly permeates the field of medical imaging, the urgency to critically evaluate the fairness of benchmark public datasets used to train them grows. Our thorough investigation reveals a multifaceted bias problem, encompassing issues such as lack of demographic representativeness, limited diversity in clinical conditions depicted, and variability in US technology used across datasets. We argue that these biases may significantly influence DL model performance, which may lead to inequities in healthcare outcomes. To address these challenges, we recommend a multilayered approach. This includes promoting practices that ensure data inclusivity, such as diversifying data sources and populations, and refining model strategies to better account for population variances. These steps will enhance the trustworthiness of DL algorithms in fetal US analysis.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), University of Macerata (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
17.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uncovering ethical biases in publicly available fetal ultrasound datasets — Emanuele Frontoni, Simona Tiribelli, et al. · npj Digital Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS