Community engaged vessel waterways management: Insights from the Noosa River stakeholder perspectives
Anthropogenic climate change is intensifying, yet significant knowledge gaps remain in managing urban vessel waterways sustainably. This study addresses this gap by exploring the challenges and opportunities for improved waterway management, drawing on stakeholder perceptions and attitudes toward proposed interventions. Using the Noosa River in Queensland, Australia, as a case study, the research employed an online survey conducted in January 2023 with 858 participants. Descriptive analysis highlighted the wide variety of recreational activities, vessel types, and storage preferences along the river. Majority of respondents expressed support for the proposed waterway management changes, with the introduction of a 28-day consecutive anchoring limit per financial year receiving the highest level of acceptance. Thematic analysis of qualitative responses revealed key concerns and support narratives, particularly regarding vessel behaviour and user responsibility. Regression analysis further identified factors influencing stakeholder attitudes toward the changes. Notably, the study findings align closely with the positions of key local stakeholder groups, including the Boating Industry Association, Noosa Boating and Fishing Alliance, and Noosa Integrated Catchment Association. These groups—along with many survey participants—emphasised the importance of addressing safety, environmental degradation, and amenity impacts. This novel study offers actionable insights for policymakers aiming to address congestion, enhance safety, and promote sustainable use of the Noosa River's waterways. • Waterways management encompass a delicate balance among shipping, recreational activities, and environmental conservation. • Effective waterway management involve stakeholder-driven plans, technological advancements, and eco-friendly practices. • Community engagement plays a pivotal role to achieve effective and transparent urban waterway management. • Quantitative and qualitative analyses were completed to learn and understand the preferences of various stakeholders.
Authors
- Turgut Acıkara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-2441)
- Alexander Paz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1217-9808)
- Tan Yiğitcanlar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7262-7118)
- Nayomi Kankanamge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-7042)
- Krishna N.S. Behara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9064-367X)
Institutions
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ocean & Coastal Management
- Published
- 2025-06-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107802
- Primary Topic
- Maritime Ports and Logistics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Department of Transport and Main Roads, Queensland Government