Addressing false alarms from high-voltage structures in subpixel fire detection

False alarms in subpixel fire detection often arise when high-voltage structures, such as powerlines or towers near thermographic cameras, emit intense infrared radiation that mimics early fire signals at long distances. This paper proposes the study and statistical analysis of You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8) to detect, segment, and isolate these sources of false alarms. YOLOv8 is trained on the Addressing False Alarm Situations (AFAS) dataset, which includes a variety of Long-Wave Infrared (LWIR) and Near-Infrared (NIR) imagery from both aerial and ground-level perspectives. The model achieves a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.784 at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.5. The contribution of this work lies in a detailed statistical analysis of YOLOv8 outputs, introducing, among others, the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF) as a metric to assess the relationship between mask overlap and detection confidence. To evaluate the model’s robustness under thermal disturbances, synthetic fires are introduced to simulate changes in the scene. The two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test compares prediction distributions with and without these anomalies, important to ensure that the model performs reliably over a wide range of scenarios so that the presence of these structures can always be determined and isolated. Finally, an energy retention metric is introduced to quantify the probability that the model’s predicted masks obscure at least half of an early fire’s energy. In critical cases where the fire appears at 2, 3, and 4 pixels from the segmented structures, these probabilities are approximately 7%, 4%, and 3%, respectively. • False alarms may be due to nearby structures that emit or reflect infrared radiation. • Thermographic technology and segmentation algorithms can reduce false alarms. • A minimal burned area at large distances can define a subpixel scenario. • In the context of fire detection, it is important not to mask a potential fire.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111324
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing false alarms from high-voltage structures in subpixel fire detection

Francisco Cabrera-Almeida, V. Araña, Antonio Galván-Hernández, Pedro J. Quintana-Morales
2 citations
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
2.61
article

Addressing false alarms from high-voltage structures in subpixel fire detection

Francisco Cabrera-Almeida, V. Araña, Antonio Galván-Hernández, Pedro J. Quintana-Morales
article en
2 citations

Abstract

False alarms in subpixel fire detection often arise when high-voltage structures, such as powerlines or towers near thermographic cameras, emit intense infrared radiation that mimics early fire signals at long distances. This paper proposes the study and statistical analysis of You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8) to detect, segment, and isolate these sources of false alarms. YOLOv8 is trained on the Addressing False Alarm Situations (AFAS) dataset, which includes a variety of Long-Wave Infrared (LWIR) and Near-Infrared (NIR) imagery from both aerial and ground-level perspectives. The model achieves a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.784 at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.5. The contribution of this work lies in a detailed statistical analysis of YOLOv8 outputs, introducing, among others, the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF) as a metric to assess the relationship between mask overlap and detection confidence. To evaluate the model’s robustness under thermal disturbances, synthetic fires are introduced to simulate changes in the scene. The two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test compares prediction distributions with and without these anomalies, important to ensure that the model performs reliably over a wide range of scenarios so that the presence of these structures can always be determined and isolated. Finally, an energy retention metric is introduced to quantify the probability that the model’s predicted masks obscure at least half of an early fire’s energy. In critical cases where the fire appears at 2, 3, and 4 pixels from the segmented structures, these probabilities are approximately 7%, 4%, and 3%, respectively. • False alarms may be due to nearby structures that emit or reflect infrared radiation. • Thermographic technology and segmentation algorithms can reduce false alarms. • A minimal burned area at large distances can define a subpixel scenario. • In the context of fire detection, it is important not to mask a potential fire.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 158
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.