Obesity, Underweight, and Accuracy of eGFR Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in a Northern European Population

Key Points Indexed eGFR cr-cys outperformed eGFR cr or eGFR cys across the body mass index (BMI) spectrum, improving GFR classification and treatment decisions. Nonindexed eGFR cr-cys led to further but smaller improvement across the BMI range that was not consistently related to BMI category. These findings inform clinical decisions on how to estimate GFR in the large segment of society living with low or high extremes of BMI. Background The presence of a low or high body mass index (BMI) in patients may influence the accuracy of eGFR. This study evaluates the performance of eGFR equations across the range of BMI. Methods This is an observational study of 4707 adults (7503 repeated observations) referred for measured GFR (mGFR) in Stockholm, Sweden. We calculated indexed eGFR (in ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ) and nonindexed eGFR (in ml/min) with validated equations that use creatinine (eGFR cr ), cystatin C (eGFR cys ), or both (eGFR cr-cys ). We assessed equation performance against indexed and nonindexed mGFR across categories of BMI with median bias, P 30 (the percentage of estimated values within 30% of mGFR), and classification of GFR categories, and modeled the implications of choice of filtration marker and indexing on clinical decisions regarding dose adjustment or eligibility for treatment. Results The mean age (SD) was 57 (16) years (39% female), and the median (interquartile range) indexed and nonindexed mGFR were 59 (39–79) and 65 (42–87) ml/min, respectively. In total, 9% of participants were underweight (BMI <20 kg/m 2 ) and 18% were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ). For indexed and nonindexed eGFR for all equations, eGFR cr overestimated mGFR at BMI <20 and ≥30 kg/m 2 , and eGFR cys underestimated mGFR at BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 . eGFR cr-cys had the least bias, acceptable P 30 , and the highest correct classification throughout the BMI range. In theoretical modeling, using indexed eGFR cr-cys versus eGFR cr would allow more accurate clinical decisions across all BMI categories. Using nonindexed versus indexed eGFR cr-cys led to further but smaller improvement that was not consistently related to BMI category for these decisions. Conclusions In a clinic population of northern European individuals referred for GFR measurement, indexed eGFR cr-cys was more accurate than indexed eGFR cr across the BMI spectrum. Using nonindexed eGFR cr-cys further improved accuracy for some treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000760
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obesity, Underweight, and Accuracy of eGFR Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in a Northern European Population

Edouard L. Fu, Alex R. Chang, Andrew S. Levey, Juan Jesús Carrero et al.
9 citations
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Nutritional Studies and Diet
16.91
article

Obesity, Underweight, and Accuracy of eGFR Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in a Northern European Population

Edouard L. Fu, Alex R. Chang, Andrew S. Levey, Juan Jesús Carrero, Lesley A. Inker, William A. Russel, Alessandro Bosi, Aurora Caldinelli
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Key Points Indexed eGFR cr-cys outperformed eGFR cr or eGFR cys across the body mass index (BMI) spectrum, improving GFR classification and treatment decisions. Nonindexed eGFR cr-cys led to further but smaller improvement across the BMI range that was not consistently related to BMI category. These findings inform clinical decisions on how to estimate GFR in the large segment of society living with low or high extremes of BMI. Background The presence of a low or high body mass index (BMI) in patients may influence the accuracy of eGFR. This study evaluates the performance of eGFR equations across the range of BMI. Methods This is an observational study of 4707 adults (7503 repeated observations) referred for measured GFR (mGFR) in Stockholm, Sweden. We calculated indexed eGFR (in ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ) and nonindexed eGFR (in ml/min) with validated equations that use creatinine (eGFR cr ), cystatin C (eGFR cys ), or both (eGFR cr-cys ). We assessed equation performance against indexed and nonindexed mGFR across categories of BMI with median bias, P 30 (the percentage of estimated values within 30% of mGFR), and classification of GFR categories, and modeled the implications of choice of filtration marker and indexing on clinical decisions regarding dose adjustment or eligibility for treatment. Results The mean age (SD) was 57 (16) years (39% female), and the median (interquartile range) indexed and nonindexed mGFR were 59 (39–79) and 65 (42–87) ml/min, respectively. In total, 9% of participants were underweight (BMI <20 kg/m 2 ) and 18% were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ). For indexed and nonindexed eGFR for all equations, eGFR cr overestimated mGFR at BMI <20 and ≥30 kg/m 2 , and eGFR cys underestimated mGFR at BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 . eGFR cr-cys had the least bias, acceptable P 30 , and the highest correct classification throughout the BMI range. In theoretical modeling, using indexed eGFR cr-cys versus eGFR cr would allow more accurate clinical decisions across all BMI categories. Using nonindexed versus indexed eGFR cr-cys led to further but smaller improvement that was not consistently related to BMI category for these decisions. Conclusions In a clinic population of northern European individuals referred for GFR measurement, indexed eGFR cr-cys was more accurate than indexed eGFR cr across the BMI spectrum. Using nonindexed eGFR cr-cys further improved accuracy for some treatment decisions.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(11)
Tufts Medical Center (US), Geisinger Medical Center (US), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Nierstichting, Hjärt-Lungfonden, Vetenskapsrådet, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
16.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.