Cognitive dissonance in programming education: A qualitative exploration of the impact of generative AI on application-directed learning

Generative AI tools, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), are already being extensively used by students to support their learning and it is important that educators understand what this might mean for higher education practice. In this study, two researchers external to the faculty teaching team conducted in-depth interviews with 12 students in a small European university of applied sciences who have recently undertaken programming learning as part of their undergraduate studies. The aim was to explore how these students were using LLMs to support their learning and their perceptions of its value as a learning tool. A thematic analysis of the resulting qualitative data revealed trends in the perceived advantages and disadvantages of using LLMs, as well as different levels of LLM usage, with more cautious use associated with a 'meaning-directed' approach to learning (learning pattern) and more enthusiastic and unrestrained use with 'application-directed' patterns of study. A tension was observed between some application-directed learners’ high use of LLMs and their recognition that this is not optimal for effective learning. The authors argue that Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT) can explain how this dissonance may motivate learners toward a dissonance-reducing attitude or behavior change. The conclusion reflects on the implications for teaching practice and offers some recommendations for how educators can increase metacognition, instrumentalize CDT to increase self-regulation, and facilitate meaning-directed learning patterns in the age of generative AI. • Higher education students can demonstrate different learning patterns • The extent to which they use LLMs for their learning may correlate with this pattern. • Many learners recognize that LLM use can inhibit effective learning • This awareness alongside high LLM use can create cognitive dissonance • Cognitive dissonance can motivate the adoption of more effective learning strategies

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100724
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive dissonance in programming education: A qualitative exploration of the impact of generative AI on application-directed learning

Samuel Boguslawski, M. Dawson, Rowan Deer
2 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Teaching and Learning Programming
3.39
article

Cognitive dissonance in programming education: A qualitative exploration of the impact of generative AI on application-directed learning

Samuel Boguslawski, M. Dawson, Rowan Deer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Generative AI tools, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), are already being extensively used by students to support their learning and it is important that educators understand what this might mean for higher education practice. In this study, two researchers external to the faculty teaching team conducted in-depth interviews with 12 students in a small European university of applied sciences who have recently undertaken programming learning as part of their undergraduate studies. The aim was to explore how these students were using LLMs to support their learning and their perceptions of its value as a learning tool. A thematic analysis of the resulting qualitative data revealed trends in the perceived advantages and disadvantages of using LLMs, as well as different levels of LLM usage, with more cautious use associated with a 'meaning-directed' approach to learning (learning pattern) and more enthusiastic and unrestrained use with 'application-directed' patterns of study. A tension was observed between some application-directed learners’ high use of LLMs and their recognition that this is not optimal for effective learning. The authors argue that Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT) can explain how this dissonance may motivate learners toward a dissonance-reducing attitude or behavior change. The conclusion reflects on the implications for teaching practice and offers some recommendations for how educators can increase metacognition, instrumentalize CDT to increase self-regulation, and facilitate meaning-directed learning patterns in the age of generative AI. • Higher education students can demonstrate different learning patterns • The extent to which they use LLMs for their learning may correlate with this pattern. • Many learners recognize that LLM use can inhibit effective learning • This awareness alongside high LLM use can create cognitive dissonance • Cognitive dissonance can motivate the adoption of more effective learning strategies

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 19
Klinik Donaustauf (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Teaching and Learning Programming
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cognitive dissonance in programming education: A qualitative exploration of the impact of generative AI on application-directed learning — Samuel Boguslawski, M. Dawson, et al. · Computers in Human Behavior Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS