A Study of Legal Framework and Capital Punishment in India

Over the last decade, India has witnessed a fluctuating but consistently high number of death sentences awarded by session courts, reflecting ongoing tensions between retributive justice and judicial restraint. Between 2016 and 2023, trial courts imposed capital punishment in significant numbers: 153 in 2016, 110 in 2017, 163 in 2018, 104 in 2019, 78 in 2020, 146 in 2021, peaking at 167 in 2022, and dropping slightly to 120 in 2023. Despite this high frequency at the trial level, higher judiciary particularly the Supreme Court has shown increasing reluctance to confirm such sentences. The appellate courts have emphasized the “rarest of rare” doctrine, reinforcing the need for individualized sentencing and consideration of mitigating factors. This reflects India’s cautious, evolving approach to capital punishment, grounded in constitutional morality, procedural fairness, and human rights jurisprudence. This paper aims to study the legal framework having punishment of death sentences and also the crimes for which death penalty awarded in India.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce Management & Social Science
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62823/ijarcmss/8.2(i).7535
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of Legal Framework and Capital Punishment in India

Lata Kumari Bhawsar, Bhawana Bhawana
International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce Management & Social Science
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

A Study of Legal Framework and Capital Punishment in India

Lata Kumari Bhawsar, Bhawana Bhawana
article en

Abstract

Over the last decade, India has witnessed a fluctuating but consistently high number of death sentences awarded by session courts, reflecting ongoing tensions between retributive justice and judicial restraint. Between 2016 and 2023, trial courts imposed capital punishment in significant numbers: 153 in 2016, 110 in 2017, 163 in 2018, 104 in 2019, 78 in 2020, 146 in 2021, peaking at 167 in 2022, and dropping slightly to 120 in 2023. Despite this high frequency at the trial level, higher judiciary particularly the Supreme Court has shown increasing reluctance to confirm such sentences. The appellate courts have emphasized the “rarest of rare” doctrine, reinforcing the need for individualized sentencing and consideration of mitigating factors. This reflects India’s cautious, evolving approach to capital punishment, grounded in constitutional morality, procedural fairness, and human rights jurisprudence. This paper aims to study the legal framework having punishment of death sentences and also the crimes for which death penalty awarded in India.

International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce Management & Social ScienceVol. 08(02(I))
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.