Deep Learning-Based Approach for Distinguishing Between AI-Generated and Human-Drawn Paintings

With the increasing number of robust Artificial Intelligence (AI) art generation applications, more realistic AI-generated paintings (AIGP) are emerging, causing a critical impact on artists. Due to the wide acceptance of AIGP, the cultural, historical and monetary value of the real masterpieces of art is becoming doubtful along with the arising question of the significance of human painters and their mastered techniques. To protect the artist’s rights, it is crucial to differentiate AIGPs from human-drawn paintings (HDP). Accordingly, the main objective of this research is to develop a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model that can automatically distinguish between AI-generated and human-drawn paintings without requiring human intervention. Without limiting to the pixel analysis like the previous literature, more features such as edge patterns, object arrangements, pattern distributions, etc. with also the gradient features were considered by the proposed model in the painting classification. A diverse set of 3000 paintings from the AI-ArtBench Dataset comprising 1500 AIGPs and 1500 HDPs across 10 different art themes was collected and pre-processed for this study. AIGPs were generated in equal amounts using Latent Diffusion and Standard Diffusion Models. The implemented CNN model achieved an optimum classification accuracy of 90% at the training data size of 10% while the ANN model exhibited 77% accuracy at the same training data size. Furthermore, models were compared using performance metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, RMSE and MAE. Through a Gradient-weighted Class Activation Map (Grad-CAM), the key features that the CNN model uses to differentiate between AIGPs and HDPs were identified. These findings emphasize the potential capability of automated systems to detect AIGPs vs HDPs for art authentication purposes. In future works, the model’s performance on different art styles and the key features specified for them will be analyzed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/scse65633.2025.11031040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-Based Approach for Distinguishing Between AI-Generated and Human-Drawn Paintings

R. A. H. M. Rupasingha, Banage T. G. S. Kumara, A. I. Warnakulasooriya
1 citations
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
1.28
article

Deep Learning-Based Approach for Distinguishing Between AI-Generated and Human-Drawn Paintings

R. A. H. M. Rupasingha, Banage T. G. S. Kumara, A. I. Warnakulasooriya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the increasing number of robust Artificial Intelligence (AI) art generation applications, more realistic AI-generated paintings (AIGP) are emerging, causing a critical impact on artists. Due to the wide acceptance of AIGP, the cultural, historical and monetary value of the real masterpieces of art is becoming doubtful along with the arising question of the significance of human painters and their mastered techniques. To protect the artist’s rights, it is crucial to differentiate AIGPs from human-drawn paintings (HDP). Accordingly, the main objective of this research is to develop a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model that can automatically distinguish between AI-generated and human-drawn paintings without requiring human intervention. Without limiting to the pixel analysis like the previous literature, more features such as edge patterns, object arrangements, pattern distributions, etc. with also the gradient features were considered by the proposed model in the painting classification. A diverse set of 3000 paintings from the AI-ArtBench Dataset comprising 1500 AIGPs and 1500 HDPs across 10 different art themes was collected and pre-processed for this study. AIGPs were generated in equal amounts using Latent Diffusion and Standard Diffusion Models. The implemented CNN model achieved an optimum classification accuracy of 90% at the training data size of 10% while the ANN model exhibited 77% accuracy at the same training data size. Furthermore, models were compared using performance metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, RMSE and MAE. Through a Gradient-weighted Class Activation Map (Grad-CAM), the key features that the CNN model uses to differentiate between AIGPs and HDPs were identified. These findings emphasize the potential capability of automated systems to detect AIGPs vs HDPs for art authentication purposes. In future works, the model’s performance on different art styles and the key features specified for them will be analyzed.

Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.