Identifying AI-generated and Human-written Answers in Sinhala Using a Deep Learning Approach

As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to answer questions increases, concerns about cheating also emerge, especially in languages like Sinhala, where efficient detection methods are lacking. This makes it easy for AI to provide incorrect or plagiarized versions of answers, undermining the fairness and creativity of education. There are similar AI-generated content detectors for the English language; however, no solution exists for the Sinhala language yet. The significance of this research lies in the proposed method's focus on the Sinhala language, addressing a major drawback of utilizing currently available deep learning-based detection systems to distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated content. The study begins with data collection, involving 1,000 academic questions, human-written answers, and AI-generated answers. The text pre- processing encompasses some operations including stemming, stop word removal and tokenization. To assess the variations, feature extraction techniques such as; term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), Global Vectors for Word (Glove), Word Embedding vectors (Word2Vec), and Document Embedding vectors (Doc2Vec) are used. Among these, TF-IDF is identified as the most effective. Numerical data is then analyzed with machine learning techniques such as ANN and LSTM. Thus, 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validation is used in order to derive more stable evaluations. Performance of the models shows that the proposed LSTM has a higher accuracy of 86% compared to the ANN accuracy 85%. LSTM also demonstrated better recall, precision, f-measure and error rates. This research also prevents the academic dishonesty compared with other sources and contributes to the construction of Sinhala language processing assets. This work paves the way for future research to explore AI detection methods in other low-resource languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/scse65633.2025.11031028
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying AI-generated and Human-written Answers in Sinhala Using a Deep Learning Approach

R. A. H. M. Rupasingha, Banage T. G. S. Kumara, R.A.D.K. Ranathunga
AI in Service Interactions
article

Identifying AI-generated and Human-written Answers in Sinhala Using a Deep Learning Approach

R. A. H. M. Rupasingha, Banage T. G. S. Kumara, R.A.D.K. Ranathunga
article en

Abstract

As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to answer questions increases, concerns about cheating also emerge, especially in languages like Sinhala, where efficient detection methods are lacking. This makes it easy for AI to provide incorrect or plagiarized versions of answers, undermining the fairness and creativity of education. There are similar AI-generated content detectors for the English language; however, no solution exists for the Sinhala language yet. The significance of this research lies in the proposed method's focus on the Sinhala language, addressing a major drawback of utilizing currently available deep learning-based detection systems to distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated content. The study begins with data collection, involving 1,000 academic questions, human-written answers, and AI-generated answers. The text pre- processing encompasses some operations including stemming, stop word removal and tokenization. To assess the variations, feature extraction techniques such as; term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), Global Vectors for Word (Glove), Word Embedding vectors (Word2Vec), and Document Embedding vectors (Doc2Vec) are used. Among these, TF-IDF is identified as the most effective. Numerical data is then analyzed with machine learning techniques such as ANN and LSTM. Thus, 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validation is used in order to derive more stable evaluations. Performance of the models shows that the proposed LSTM has a higher accuracy of 86% compared to the ANN accuracy 85%. LSTM also demonstrated better recall, precision, f-measure and error rates. This research also prevents the academic dishonesty compared with other sources and contributes to the construction of Sinhala language processing assets. This work paves the way for future research to explore AI detection methods in other low-resource languages.

Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.