How to fund nonprofits?

Governments support nonprofits through direct grants and tax incentives for private donations, but the optimal mix of these tools remains unclear. I develop a model in which households donate to multiple causes and the government can use both instruments to support nonprofit funding. A key determinant of the optimal policy mix is tax discrimination, defined as the ability to vary tax incentives by cause. When tax discrimination is feasible, warm-glow giving makes private funding more efficient, reducing the need for grants. However, when tax discrimination is constrained, grants become essential to compensate for the rigidity of the tax system. In a calibrated example, the optimal government share of nonprofit funding rises from 0% to 60% as tax discrimination becomes more limited. When donations are leaky, delivering less than a dollar of value per dollar given, the importance of tax discrimination declines. In the extreme case of uniform leakage, Pareto efficiency can be achieved with grants and a linear tax credit, uniform across causes, similar to the systems currently implemented in Belgium, France, or New Zealand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economics
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105753
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to fund nonprofits?

Eddy Zanoutène
Journal of Public Economics
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

How to fund nonprofits?

Eddy Zanoutène
article en

Abstract

Governments support nonprofits through direct grants and tax incentives for private donations, but the optimal mix of these tools remains unclear. I develop a model in which households donate to multiple causes and the government can use both instruments to support nonprofit funding. A key determinant of the optimal policy mix is tax discrimination, defined as the ability to vary tax incentives by cause. When tax discrimination is feasible, warm-glow giving makes private funding more efficient, reducing the need for grants. However, when tax discrimination is constrained, grants become essential to compensate for the rigidity of the tax system. In a calibrated example, the optimal government share of nonprofit funding rises from 0% to 60% as tax discrimination becomes more limited. When donations are leaky, delivering less than a dollar of value per dollar given, the importance of tax discrimination declines. In the extreme case of uniform leakage, Pareto efficiency can be achieved with grants and a linear tax credit, uniform across causes, similar to the systems currently implemented in Belgium, France, or New Zealand.

Journal of Public EconomicsVol. 262
CY Cergy Paris Université (FR)
CY Cergy Paris Université, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.