Indirect estimation of contact selectivity for gill nets using hierarchical models

Indirect estimation of selectivities for gill nets is frequently conducted to evaluate size-related differences in vulnerability, with catches typically pooled across multiple net sets when estimating. An alternative to pooling catches would be to use hierarchical modeling to estimate selectivities, which would allow for variability in selectivity among sets to be assessed and to account for spatial or temporal autocorrelation across sets. We estimated selectivities for gill nets using several hierarchical model formulations using walleye Sander vitreus catch data from two experimental gillnet configurations in Lake Erie. Hierarchical selectivity curves were more supported from an information-theoretic perspective than nonhierarchical versions, although convergence and model complexity issues arose for some models incorporating spatial autocorrelation. Hierarchical bi-normal selectivity curves, where set-specific parameter deviations were modeled through univariate normal distributions were most supported by available data for both configurations. Given the availability of flexible software for fitting and diagnosing hierarchical models, we recommend that hierarchical modeling of contact selectivity be considered to improve understanding of set-specific variability in selectivities with multiple deployments rather than automatically pooling catch data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2024-0248
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indirect estimation of contact selectivity for gill nets using hierarchical models

Matthew D. Faust, Travis O. Brenden, Chris Cahill
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
1.24
article

Indirect estimation of contact selectivity for gill nets using hierarchical models

Matthew D. Faust, Travis O. Brenden, Chris Cahill
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Indirect estimation of selectivities for gill nets is frequently conducted to evaluate size-related differences in vulnerability, with catches typically pooled across multiple net sets when estimating. An alternative to pooling catches would be to use hierarchical modeling to estimate selectivities, which would allow for variability in selectivity among sets to be assessed and to account for spatial or temporal autocorrelation across sets. We estimated selectivities for gill nets using several hierarchical model formulations using walleye Sander vitreus catch data from two experimental gillnet configurations in Lake Erie. Hierarchical selectivity curves were more supported from an information-theoretic perspective than nonhierarchical versions, although convergence and model complexity issues arose for some models incorporating spatial autocorrelation. Hierarchical bi-normal selectivity curves, where set-specific parameter deviations were modeled through univariate normal distributions were most supported by available data for both configurations. Given the availability of flexible software for fitting and diagnosing hierarchical models, we recommend that hierarchical modeling of contact selectivity be considered to improve understanding of set-specific variability in selectivities with multiple deployments rather than automatically pooling catch data.

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesVol. 82
Ohio Department of Natural Resources (US), Michigan Department of Natural Resources (US), Michigan United (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.