Braidotti within Reason

Abstract Rosi Braidotti is a major philosopher and feminist thinker, who has authored numerous academic articles, monographs, anthologies, and reference manuals. She is a highly influential critical posthumanist. Her non-anthropocentric vision of posthuman ethical subjectivity and her drawing on science for its realization and vision of transdisciplinary posthumanities intersecting with the sciences, based on mutual respect, are both to be lauded. Though there is much to praise in Braidotti’s scholarship, there are difficulties in achieving the mutual respect between the posthumanities and sciences that she desires. This respect is more likely to be achieved by grounding her non-anthropocentric vision in an unwaveringly accurate appreciation of science and consistently adopting universal standards of sound reasoning accepted in the sciences. Given Braidotti’s influence in critical posthumanism, and in the interests of helping to facilitate more effective dialogue between critical posthumanism and science, this article shines a light on these difficulties. In a nutshell, Braidotti’s vision is compelling, but how she argues for it often is not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthuman Studies
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.8.2.0137
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Braidotti within Reason

Kieran O’Halloran
Journal of Posthuman Studies
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Braidotti within Reason

Kieran O’Halloran
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rosi Braidotti is a major philosopher and feminist thinker, who has authored numerous academic articles, monographs, anthologies, and reference manuals. She is a highly influential critical posthumanist. Her non-anthropocentric vision of posthuman ethical subjectivity and her drawing on science for its realization and vision of transdisciplinary posthumanities intersecting with the sciences, based on mutual respect, are both to be lauded. Though there is much to praise in Braidotti’s scholarship, there are difficulties in achieving the mutual respect between the posthumanities and sciences that she desires. This respect is more likely to be achieved by grounding her non-anthropocentric vision in an unwaveringly accurate appreciation of science and consistently adopting universal standards of sound reasoning accepted in the sciences. Given Braidotti’s influence in critical posthumanism, and in the interests of helping to facilitate more effective dialogue between critical posthumanism and science, this article shines a light on these difficulties. In a nutshell, Braidotti’s vision is compelling, but how she argues for it often is not.

Journal of Posthuman StudiesVol. 8(2)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.