Comparison of thermal and chemical purification methods for graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries

• Spent graphite was purified by chemical, thermal, and combination methods. • Cathode metals were removed from spent graphite using mild acid-leaching conditions. • Aluminum removal required alkaline or thermal conditions. • Combination methods produced graphite with the highest purity and the least defects. Graphite is a key anode material in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), and its demand is rising with the increasing need for LIBs. Even though spent LIBs contain 12–21 wt% graphite, the material is not currently recovered. Therefore, there is a need for sustainable graphite recycling and purification processes. This study compared purification technologies (hydrometallurgical, thermal, and a combination) to two spent graphite (SG) samples from industrial LIB black masses with initial purities of 69.2 wt% (SG1) and 89.9 wt% (SG2). Both samples contained impurities like lithium, nickel, manganese, cobalt, and aluminum. Sulfuric acid efficiently removed cathode material metals (97.2–98.9 % from SG1) under mild conditions (temperature: 50 °C, time: 30 min, sulfuric acid: 0.5 mol/L, L/S ratio: 10 mL/g) with excess hydrogen peroxide. However, one of the main impurities, aluminum, was not removed. The removal (96.0 % from SG1) required alkaline conditions (temperature: 100 °C, time: 240 min, sodium hydroxide: 10 mol/L, L/S ratio: 20 mL/g). For comparison, thermal treatment (2400 °C, 15 min) was applied by induction annealing in an argon atmosphere to untreated, acid–treated, and acid–alkali–treated samples. Thermal and combination treatments offered the benefit of structural repair in addition to metallic and organic impurity removal, producing graphite with carbon content up to 99.1 wt%. These graphite purification steps improved the electrochemical performance and increased the cyclability of the cells. This study provides valuable information on the removal of impurities from black mass-derived SG, which is essential in the development of SG recovery processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Separation and Purification Technology
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133992
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of thermal and chemical purification methods for graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries

Anna Lähde, Sari Tuomikoski, Toni Kauppinen, Ulla M. Lassi et al.
5 citations
Separation and Purification Technology
Extraction and Separation Processes
3.57
article

Comparison of thermal and chemical purification methods for graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries

Anna Lähde, Sari Tuomikoski, Toni Kauppinen, Ulla M. Lassi, Juho Välikangas, Venla Rantala, Tiandou Hu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Spent graphite was purified by chemical, thermal, and combination methods. • Cathode metals were removed from spent graphite using mild acid-leaching conditions. • Aluminum removal required alkaline or thermal conditions. • Combination methods produced graphite with the highest purity and the least defects. Graphite is a key anode material in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), and its demand is rising with the increasing need for LIBs. Even though spent LIBs contain 12–21 wt% graphite, the material is not currently recovered. Therefore, there is a need for sustainable graphite recycling and purification processes. This study compared purification technologies (hydrometallurgical, thermal, and a combination) to two spent graphite (SG) samples from industrial LIB black masses with initial purities of 69.2 wt% (SG1) and 89.9 wt% (SG2). Both samples contained impurities like lithium, nickel, manganese, cobalt, and aluminum. Sulfuric acid efficiently removed cathode material metals (97.2–98.9 % from SG1) under mild conditions (temperature: 50 °C, time: 30 min, sulfuric acid: 0.5 mol/L, L/S ratio: 10 mL/g) with excess hydrogen peroxide. However, one of the main impurities, aluminum, was not removed. The removal (96.0 % from SG1) required alkaline conditions (temperature: 100 °C, time: 240 min, sodium hydroxide: 10 mol/L, L/S ratio: 20 mL/g). For comparison, thermal treatment (2400 °C, 15 min) was applied by induction annealing in an argon atmosphere to untreated, acid–treated, and acid–alkali–treated samples. Thermal and combination treatments offered the benefit of structural repair in addition to metallic and organic impurity removal, producing graphite with carbon content up to 99.1 wt%. These graphite purification steps improved the electrochemical performance and increased the cyclability of the cells. This study provides valuable information on the removal of impurities from black mass-derived SG, which is essential in the development of SG recovery processes.

Separation and Purification TechnologyVol. 376
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Keski-Pohjanmaan keskussairaala (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Interreg
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Extraction and Separation Processes
3.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.