A methodology for CFD simulations of floating structures in waves coupled with mooring dynamics

Prediction of the responses in wave fields of moored floating structures, such as floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT), wave energy converters (WEC), aquaculture farms (AF), or floating breakwaters (FB), requires high-fidelity yet efficient coupled analysis between Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and mooring dynamic models. Among the coupled models available to users for the open-source CFD software OpenFOAM and mooring libraries like MoorDyn, we can find foamMooring and FloatStepper. These address issues such as added mass instability, and offer different computational methods for free-surface capturing and rigid body motion. If we also consider the various dynamic mesh techniques, users have multiple options for the general configuration of a simulation. Bearing this in mind, the present study proposes an efficient and accurate methodology for simulations with OpenFOAM coupled with the lumped-mass mooring model Moordyn for a simple floating structure, with the intention of applying it to more complex structures, or even performing survivability studies. Pursuing this goal, different dynamic mesh techniques, free-surface capturing methods and the available algorithms for rigid body motions including an added-mass correction algorithm, are investigated systematically and validated against experimental data. In the course of this work, new features have been added to the lastest version of Moordyn and also coupled with the non-iterative algorithm FloatStepper. The surface elevation, floating body motions and mooring line tensions were considered to compare the different settings. The results showed that all the tested options were accurate, but the overset technique was the most efficient in terms of computational time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean Engineering
Published
2025-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121764
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A methodology for CFD simulations of floating structures in waves coupled with mooring dynamics

Anne Gosset, Vicente Díaz Casás, J. L. Cercos-Pita, Tanausú Almeida-Medina
Ocean Engineering
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
article

A methodology for CFD simulations of floating structures in waves coupled with mooring dynamics

Anne Gosset, Vicente Díaz Casás, J. L. Cercos-Pita, Tanausú Almeida-Medina
article en

Abstract

Prediction of the responses in wave fields of moored floating structures, such as floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT), wave energy converters (WEC), aquaculture farms (AF), or floating breakwaters (FB), requires high-fidelity yet efficient coupled analysis between Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and mooring dynamic models. Among the coupled models available to users for the open-source CFD software OpenFOAM and mooring libraries like MoorDyn, we can find foamMooring and FloatStepper. These address issues such as added mass instability, and offer different computational methods for free-surface capturing and rigid body motion. If we also consider the various dynamic mesh techniques, users have multiple options for the general configuration of a simulation. Bearing this in mind, the present study proposes an efficient and accurate methodology for simulations with OpenFOAM coupled with the lumped-mass mooring model Moordyn for a simple floating structure, with the intention of applying it to more complex structures, or even performing survivability studies. Pursuing this goal, different dynamic mesh techniques, free-surface capturing methods and the available algorithms for rigid body motions including an added-mass correction algorithm, are investigated systematically and validated against experimental data. In the course of this work, new features have been added to the lastest version of Moordyn and also coupled with the non-iterative algorithm FloatStepper. The surface elevation, floating body motions and mooring line tensions were considered to compare the different settings. The results showed that all the tested options were accurate, but the overset technique was the most efficient in terms of computational time.

Ocean EngineeringVol. 336
Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Universidade da Coruña
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.